TruBluSince1982
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,793
- Reaction score
- 1,340
Good Lord, I knew this was an unpopular trade but there is like a grand total of five of us who thought this was a good move. Thru 81 pages lol
For the record, I wa supportive of the trade and my comment can be found on page 16 of the thread
There is a pretty large consensus there. I did not see any post from me in the first 10 pages but I was against the trade as well. Most of the consensus was that Jerry made a trade so, by historical results, it has to be a bad move. (ie. Galloway and Williams)There’s some pure gold here:
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/amari-cooper-traded-to-cowboys-merged.418243/
“Consider it a monumental failure if we gave up more than a 3rd round draft pick”.
lol
You sounded angry about the Cooper trade hahahaha.
I said it then and I'll say it now. You only trade away a first round pick during the season if you think you are one piece away from a SB run.
We did it to save the season. And save Jason Garrett's job.
Neither of those reasons makes the cut.
Their owner supports sex trafficking. You should google that sometime.
Great, great, trade.
And to think, nearly everyone was saying we gave up way too much.
I'm just looking the facts straight in the eye. They are the best run organization in football and its been that way for a long time. Comparing them to the cowboys and our clown of a GM is laughable.
I said it then and I'll say it now. You only trade away a first round pick during the season if you think you are one piece away from a SB run.
We did it to save the season. And save Jason Garrett's job.
Neither of those reasons makes the cut.
I disagree with this because Amari wasn't traded for to be a one year boost to the team. He was traded for to be a help both immediately and in the future, and it was obvious that for the team to compete both immediately and in the future it would need to dramatically upgrade at WR. It happened that the Raiders were trading away a lot of players last year, so the Cowboys were able to take advantage. Of course, for the plan to work they are going to have to be able to extend Cooper beyond this season.
Reading through that thread. Some serious crow eating needs done.
There is a pretty large consensus there. I did not see any post from me in the first 10 pages but I was against the trade as well
Yep, that sounds about right - I was not fond of the move and Amari had disapeared in Oakland! There was no evidence of this Amari at that time!Looks like this was your initial response.
https://cowboyszone.com/posts/8593044/
Yea, most everyone was against it.
Some folks said some pretty funny stuff, in hindsight.
Yep, that sounds about right - I was not fond of the move and Amari had disapeared in Oakland! There was no evidence of this Amari at that time!
I think it's amazing what a change of team can do for a player. Oakland's Oline was a complete disaster and effected every player on that team. Cooper is a much better fit for Dak that's for sure and Dez was his own worst enemy - I had always said that.What do you think a year later?
Coop’s production, plus the fact that the pick we traded ended up being 27th overall, makes it worth it, in my opinion.
Also think Coop is a better fit for Dak than Dez was.
I don’t think Dez was ever going to develop chemistry with Dak anywhere near the level he had with Romo. And that’s NOT a knock on any of them. Just didn’t “fit” all that well.