To me, it's a price Texas will eventually have to pay because of the decision they made with Osweiler. To me, its a window discussion for Texas. They have a team, IMO, that could really challenge if they had good QB play. The real question is, will Texas be willing to wait the three seasons, or so, it would take to get a young QB up to speed and ready to seriously challenge for a Super Bowl or are they willing to be patient and wait and if they wait, are they rebuilding their team again because the window has closed?
Yep. Very unlikely Houston would tie that much money up in two QB's. Romo would be far too expensive, and risky, for the GM to take on. Imagine another early season injury to Tony. After the Osweiler mess the GM would be hard pressed to explain signing another high risk QB.I think what McNair's intention might well be is to save the cost that Tony would likely command and go the bargain basement route in the draft. The Osweiler commitment is an extremely hefty one. I'm thinking he's likely feeling the pinch and wants to minimize the bleeding.
I still have hope.
This...I don't know if Texas is a real consideration or not but, assuming Texas does go QB in the draft, that doesn't mean they are not interested in Tony IMO.
Watt and Clowney? Lmao. Why not Nuke too?The Texans want a young QB? So we keep Romo and trade Dak for Watt and Clowney. I make that deal!