VirusX said:
The body graphics are good except when you look at the limbs. The chicken legs simply wont do for a 6'3 280 lb Dlinemen. The running animations look horrid as far as a straight run the angle of the upper body looks very off for "Lifelike" graphics unless you have a 3 foot stick jammed up your anus. The animations are good but all the screen shots you see of ESPN are from XBox not PS2. As for maddens graphics ill take a hit in the crisp graphics department for real looking runs and gameplay. Cant wait till the 9th then i can make my final judgement.
I don't see that........I remember my players lining up for an extra-point and thinking, "Man, they even put the fat butts on the OL...especially Flo."
Willie Blade in particular, looked big all-around....even in the legs.
I think the running does look a little funny, but no different than the Madden games I've played. I feel that ESPN is more playable than Madden. For the life of me, I can't complete a pass in Madden to save my life.
Now, I'll admit that I haven't played a lot of Madden. I've always been frustrated with it. But ESPN grabbed me right from the get go.
I don't care if ESPN surpasses Madden. For me, it's close enough. Throw in the $20 price tag and it blows Madden out of the water.
I may rent Madden......but to me it isn't $30 better than ESPN. Hopefully, EA will take a hint and lower the price of their product.