big dog cowboy;3096302 said:Yippee.
Another Ogletree thread.
:horse:
juck;3096296 said:Its time.Romo likes him. Jerry likes him. The kid is laterally quick and can get OPEN and move the chains. RW is doing nothing.
iceberg;3096309 said:every year we have some player where you just add water and wa-la, it's a perfect world and they're out there tearing it up.
only, every year it's a different player and we never hear from the last guy anymore.
big dog cowboy;3096302 said:Yippee.
Another Ogletree thread.
:horse:
Crad|e;3096357 said:Exactly replacing RW with Otree could not hurt us a bit. Production wise we'd have to be way better off if anything.
big dog cowboy;3096302 said:Yippee.
Another Ogletree thread.
:horse:
If Romo was 0-20 in most games then yea it would be the case.rocyaice;3096359 said:I wonder how long is it going to take for people to ask to see Stephen Mcgee lol.
juck;3096715 said:If Romo was 0-20 in most games then yea it would be the case.
RW gives us nothing because he does not get open and he cant catch.
I would say Otree can get open,and catch the ball.
Can Otree get any worse then no catches?and 3 drops a game?
rocyaice;3096742 said:Maybe. But i'd rather wait and see on Roy then bring in a rookie who's done nothing but catch screen passes. He can do that in a 3 receiver set. Doesn't need to be listed as a starter to do that.
alancdc;3096304 said:Knew it was coming, but doesn't mean it's wrong.
rocyaice;3096742 said:Maybe. But i'd rather wait and see on Roy then bring in a rookie who's done nothing but catch screen passes. He can do that in a 3 receiver set. Doesn't need to be listed as a starter to do that.
Gaede;3096745 said:...but at least he's catching them when they're thrown to him