tyke1doe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 54,312
- Reaction score
- 32,716
I rolled my eyes because you assumed I was talking about the Falcons which I wasn't.[
Second that's not what I said. If you want to penny pinch on every word I post then that's your problem. What I meant is the Giants can get on a roll because they have had a soft schedule meaning past and future games.
Third the Bills are not good. Great they are 2-2. They have a lot to prove before I start saying they are a good team.
I think this may be a case where you said something, and you really didn't pay attention to what you said or didn't think anyone would question you. Let's go back to your original comment:
mldardy said:The Giants could get on a roll not because they are good but because their schedule is really light. Good Lord they have played next to nobody these past few weeks.
So the Giants have played next to nobody? This is who they've played.
Dallas
Atlanta
Washington
Buffalo
Each of those teams either having winning records or are 500. And the reason two of them are 500 is because the Giants beat them.
Furthermore, I asked you how do you define next to nobody, and you didn't instead saying I'm penny pinching your words. I'm merely attempting to understand your point. If you make a statement on a public forum, shouldn't we understand what it is you're saying? Is that penny pinching?
Anyway, I receive your opinion that you believe the Bills aren't good team. And the future might bear that out. But right now, they're 2-2 with a pretty good defense.
I wouldn't call 2-2 "next to nobody".