FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,574
- Reaction score
- 27,859
You're hilarious how you always interpret the motives of a poster who disagrees with you. I started this thread. You're the one who changed the subject to whether or not Murray is a power back.
I notice you kinda talked in circles around my question as to whether or not you believe any back on our roster runs with as much power as Murray. But I think you said Randle and Williams can run with as much power as Murray given the opportunity, right?
The same brain in the first paragraph ridicules me for interpreting your motives then creates a narrative about what my motives are in the last paragraph. Logical consistency is a struggle for you.
I am talking about your narrative and not your motive. You are repeating this narrative and trying to steer it back. You don't even argue that. Nope, you make it about me talking about your narrative and then accuse me of trying to go around in circles. I don't think about players like you and I am not big on pigeonholing players with one word labels.
I think Randle and Williams are more explosive than Murray to the line. I think Randall has better leg drive to push piles. Murrays strength was well roundedness, toughness and consistency. He could run with a little power but he wasn't overpowering. He could wiggle a bit in the openfield but wasn't breaking ankles regularly. He could get into the secondary and make big plays but he couldn't outrun defensive backs. The beauty of Murray was that he could maintain that level of play from the first snap to the 25th.
I never said Randle or anyone was better particularly when you factor the total package but your desire to fixate on one thing and aggrandize it is a waste of time. Oversimplification has it's fans apparently but not me not ever.