Pacman faces two felony charges

[Bob Sacamano]

I never made any such accusation...

no?....

probably what you said when the Duke players were accused.

 

[peplaw06]

no?....

I know you searched furiously for the quote that would prove that I...

labled everyone who are behind Goodell suspending Pac-Man as people who were quick to villify the Duke Lacrosse players, in another thread

... and yet again, you fail.

That quote was so taken out of context, but you probably know that, that's why you only quoted a small portion. Lemme drop some knowledge on you here real quick.

That quote by me was in response to this nugget said by you.

but again, if idiots want to continue to act stupid, they deserve it

I responded by saying that's "probably what you said when the Duke players were accused." Definitely not as severe as you would have everyone believe...

he labled everyone who are behind Goodell suspending Pac-Man as people who were quick to villify the Duke Lacrosse players, in another thread

It wasn't referring to "everyone," it was referring to you. And it had nothing to do with the Goodell issues. You stated that if people "want to continue to act stupid, they deserve it." I never said you were "quick to vilify the Duke players." I was intimating that you probably thought they "deserved it." Got it now?

And then the quote in this thread that started the whole thing.

So your opinion is fine in the Court of Public Opinion, but those who happen to have the Opinion that they'll wait until the case has played out legally before judging someone are wrong?

You guys love to call us Pacman Supporters or his defense team, but in fact all we're doing is waiting before we condemn someone. What's wrong with that?

You can have your opinion, we'll have ours.

You thought I took offense to Stash's comment, but I didn't... Like I said earlier, I just was showing him how I thought he was wrong. I even said, "you can have your opinion, we'll have ours."

So again, where's the irony??

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I know you searched furiously for the quote that would prove that I...... and yet again, you fail.

That quote was so taken out of context, but you probably know that, that's why you only quoted a small portion. Lemme drop some knowledge on you here real quick.

That quote by me was in response to this nugget said by you.

I responded by saying that's "probably what you said when the Duke players were accused." Definitely not as severe as you would have everyone believe... It wasn't referring to "everyone," it was referring to you. And it had nothing to do with the Goodell issues. You stated that if people "want to continue to act stupid, they deserve it." I never said you were "quick to vilify the Duke players." I was intimating that you probably thought they "deserved it." Got it now?

And then the quote in this thread that started the whole thing. You thought I took offense to Stash's comment, but I didn't... Like I said earlier, I just was showing him how I thought he was wrong. I even said, "you can have your opinion, we'll have ours."

So again, where's the irony??

you're right, you were just talking about me, but just like you assumed I believed the Duke players were guilty, you are quick to tell someone not to assume that you are defending pac-man

can't have it both ways pal

 

[peplaw06]

you're right, you were just talking about me, but just like you assumed I believed the Duke players were guilty, you are quick to tell someone not to assume that you are defending pac-man

The problem with that line of argument is that you actually said "people who act stupid deserve it."

I never said I was defending Pacman. It's an epidemic of people on this board confusing support for the judicial system with defending the accused.

I made the assumption based directly from your words. You (and others) make the assumption based on a misperception of the circumstances.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

The problem with that line of argument is that you actually said "people who act stupid deserve it."

I never said I was defending Pacman. It's an epidemic of people on this board confusing support for the judicial system with defending the accused.

I made the assumption based directly from your words.

what I said was a general statement, you decided to associate the Duke case w/ it

You (and others) make the assumption based on a misperception of the circumstances.

when have I ever accused you of sticking up for Pac-Man? you're speaking as a laywer, not as a fan of Pac-Man, I know this, talk to the other guys about that

 

[burmafrd]

I hold with Shakespear's opinon on lawyers.