Peerless Price: The good, the bad, the ugly...

[TruBlueCowboy]

Uh, in half a season he racked up 416 yards and 5 TDs.

If Peerless gets 800+ yards and 9-10 TDs I'll be ecstatic.

Staying healthy, and being able to play through the pain, is part of playing the game too. Some guys just can't run a few yards without pulling something.

 

[wileedog]

Staying healthy, and being able to play through the pain, is part of playing the game too. Some guys just can't run a few yards without pulling something.

What does Galloways injury problems have to do with Peerless Price, who BTW is 5 years younger and has never missed an NFL game?

 

[TruBlueCowboy]

What does Galloways injury problems have to do with Peerless Price, who BTW is 5 years younger and has never missed an NFL game?

I didn't say it had anything to do with Price. You said Galloway would have had good numbers if not for his injury. My point is Galloway can't stay healthy.

 

[wileedog]

I didn't say it had anything to do with Price. You said Galloway would have had good numbers if not for his injury. My point is Galloway can't stay healthy.

The point you originally made is that some said Galloway would play better with a better QB.

Guess what, he did. That's the point.

Granted, it was for only half a season because Galloway makes Jacob Rogers look tough, but when he was in there he was a better receiver than he was playing with Quincy. And Tampa doesn't throw downfield nearly as much either.

Thre's no way to use Galloway as an example that somehow Peerless wont produce more with a QB whose actually interested in a passing game.

 

[TruBlueCowboy]

The point you originally made is that some said Galloway would play better with a better QB.

Guess what, he did. That's the point.

Granted, it was for only half a season because Galloway makes Jacob Rogers look tough, but when he was in there he was a better receiver than he was playing with Quincy. And Tampa doesn't throw downfield nearly as much either.

Thre's no way to use Galloway as an example that somehow Peerless wont produce more with a QB whose actually interested in a passing game.

I'll solve this argment real quick. In 10 games, he had 33 receptions for 416 yards. You call those better numbers? In 2002, he had 61 receptions for 908 yards. Same results with or without Quincy Carter. Some receivers just weren't meant to be the #1 guy. Peerless Price wasn't meant to be, and if he realizes that, fine, he can sign. Just don't take away time from the young guys like Crayton who may have the potential to be significant starters in Dallas one day. Basically, I look at Peerless as an inferior Terry Glenn. Glenn has better hands, Keyshawn is more physical, Crayton is the young talent, why mess with a good thing?

 

[wileedog]

I'll solve this argment real quick. In 10 games, he had 33 receptions for 416 yards. You call those better numbers? In 2002, he had 61 receptions for 908 yards. Same results with or without Quincy Carter.

Convenient you left out Galloways 2003 numbers - 34 catches for 674 yards and only 2 TDs.

Some receivers just weren't meant to be the #1 guy. Peerless Price wasn't meant to be, and if he realizes that, fine, he can sign. Just don't take away time from the young guys like Crayton who may have the potential to be significant starters in Dallas one day.

I don't want PP to be #1, nor get paid like a #1. I agree with you 100% he's not a #1, and thought so when Atlanta traded for him.

But he's good depth and good insurance if Terry goes down. We were utterly screwed last year when Glenn got hurt, and I think Price will alleviate the problem should Terry get knicked again. And I do think he has some upside playing with Bledsoe over Vick.

If Price wants any more than that in money or playing time I'll be right there with ya kicking his arse out of Jerry's Press Box.

 

[Rack]

Convenient you left out Galloways 2003 numbers - 34 catches for 674 yards and only 2 TDs.

Galloway wasn't the #1 WR that year, Glenn was.