yimyammer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,575
- Reaction score
- 7,005
Has anyone done an analysis to see what percentage of penalties were the result of a player getting beat versus a mental lapse?
I kind of put penalties in three categories:
1. Mental-These in my mind are unacceptable because they are the result of simply not understanding a rule or not concentrating. Example: false starts, not establishing yourself back in bounds before making a tackle.
2. Skill/Talent/Physical-These are the result of being beat by the opposing player and seem to be evidence of a lack of talent or simply losing a given play. These bother me less because if a player is less talented, a penalty may be the better option to simply being beat. An example would be when a cornerback is beat and has to commit pass interference in order to prevent a TD.
3. Aggression-These bother me the least and I almost feel a few of them might actually be good for a team. These are penalties where a team is so aggressive and violent that they occasionally get a few late hits that result in personal fouls. An example would be where a player hits the QB a smidge too late and gets a personal foul. I think it might be beneficial to be known as a team that will bring the pain in exchange for a few penalties if that means you get in the other teams head and cause the QB to rush his decisions.
I haven't gone back and reviewed every penalty, but my guess is the bulk of the penalties are the result of categories 1 and 2 with little to no penalties resulting from category 3.
I may be wrong here but it seems to me the penalties on Jenkins last weekend were the result of him being beat on the play. Likewise with Baron's hold in Washington.
If the bulk of the penalties are the result of category 2, then I think this is a reflection on the talent we have (or don't have) and maybe that's something we're having trouble coming to grips with.
Thoughts?
I kind of put penalties in three categories:
1. Mental-These in my mind are unacceptable because they are the result of simply not understanding a rule or not concentrating. Example: false starts, not establishing yourself back in bounds before making a tackle.
2. Skill/Talent/Physical-These are the result of being beat by the opposing player and seem to be evidence of a lack of talent or simply losing a given play. These bother me less because if a player is less talented, a penalty may be the better option to simply being beat. An example would be when a cornerback is beat and has to commit pass interference in order to prevent a TD.
3. Aggression-These bother me the least and I almost feel a few of them might actually be good for a team. These are penalties where a team is so aggressive and violent that they occasionally get a few late hits that result in personal fouls. An example would be where a player hits the QB a smidge too late and gets a personal foul. I think it might be beneficial to be known as a team that will bring the pain in exchange for a few penalties if that means you get in the other teams head and cause the QB to rush his decisions.
I haven't gone back and reviewed every penalty, but my guess is the bulk of the penalties are the result of categories 1 and 2 with little to no penalties resulting from category 3.
I may be wrong here but it seems to me the penalties on Jenkins last weekend were the result of him being beat on the play. Likewise with Baron's hold in Washington.
If the bulk of the penalties are the result of category 2, then I think this is a reflection on the talent we have (or don't have) and maybe that's something we're having trouble coming to grips with.
Thoughts?
