AbeBeta
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,745
- Reaction score
- 12,461
The defense is arguing his BAC level should be looked at in context to his size. I understand this is true to an extent (ie, it takes a higher BAC for a larger person to feel and act inebriated). The prosecution is countering with other evidence indicating he was impaired.
Doesn't he have more blood though because of his size? It's a %, right?
Also, the law doesn't make that distinction in the over the limit way -- you can be cited if you are acting drunk but are under the limit but the reverse don't work