bayeslife
187beatdown
- Messages
- 9,467
- Reaction score
- 8,590
wileedog;3310425 said:Wait, are you insinuating that a 2nd year, 2nd string TE with 35 career catches was being double covered?
Absolutely not, but I'm sure that it will be misinterpreted if what stasheroo said that I replied to gets lost in this mess:
stasheroo;3310201 said:And he knew it poorly enough to be a complete no-factor in the passing game. See how that works?
I'm not saying at all that MB was being double covered (though there may be some evidence to say otherwise in some games). I'm just pointing out how foolish it is to think that just because someone isn't producing, it means that they don't know their playbook well enough. Who knows, MB could be the most un-gifted TE in the history of the world, and maybe that's why he's not producing.
But of course, since MB has set up that kind of aura about him, people will go storming in with their agendas and hound on that one aspect of his personality and try to twist things to make it seem like he's not handling business when it comes to his career. Could it be that he's not studying his playbook? Perhaps, though like theogt has been saying, where's the evidence to prove that?
Off my point a bit, but all I hear about Bennett is, "well he could be better if he wasn't on facebook all the time" or "he should study his playbook instead of going on twitter."
Sounds suspiciously like all the times when we have to put up with Romo for golfing.
[in b4 "show me"]