Peterson or Gilmore?

[AmericasTeam81]

Obviously Gilmore is the better choice since we traded for him duh

 

[darthseinfeld]

What were Gilmore's?

https://cowboyszone.com/threads/some-2022-numbers-for-stephon-gilmore.509053/page-3#post-12662579

 

[BobSacamano]

It sounds good to say Peterson wasn't good last year. Most people will just assume it's true. Especially when your team got the other guy.

Both Gilmore and Peterson are getting the assumption that they sucked last year because they are both going to be 33 next year.

 

[Big_D]

How about Wagner or LVE?

 

[Manwiththeplan]

It sounds good to say Peterson wasn't good last year. Most people will just assume it's true. Especially when your team got the other guy.

He had 15 PD and 5 Ints...I don't think any objective person would say he wasn't any good

And I know everyone hates pff except when it fits their narrative, but Peterson was an 80, Gilmore was a 79

Both of whioh are really good

 

[HungryLion]

I'm getting a comparable player and keeping my 5th round pick.

Advantage me.

Cowboys could have used that 5th round pick to upgrade the starting QB position.

 

[gimmesix]

I think Peterson is the better choice because of no need for compensation and you'd get him for two years at a decent price. But abilitywise, it's a fine line between them either way.

 

[links18]

I'm getting a comparable player and keeping my 5th round pick.

Advantage me.

We know how the Jones Boyz strike oil with those 5th rounders.

 

[Brooksey]

The fact that we picked up either one is shocking. I'd be happy with either one, rather keep the 5th but don't know the circumstances.

 

[gtb1943]

I'm getting a comparable player and keeping my 5th round pick.

Advantage me.

Yeah, we have gotten so many starters in the 5th rd...

oh, wait....

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

We know how the Jones Boyz strike oil with those 5th rounders.

I mean…we did draft Damone Clark and Daron Bland lol. Starters.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Play GM. Which deal would you have done? Let's even say you have to add an extra million to Peterson's deal to make him choose Dallas but for all we know he may not have needed it.


2 years, 15 million for the 32 year old Patrick Peterson.

Or, this for the 32 year old Stephon Gilmore as well as a 5th round comp pick.

Peterson for 2 years for cheaper and no pick.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Play GM. Which deal would you have done?

This is a softball question.

Gilmore >>>>>>>>>>> Peterson

 

[darthseinfeld]

This is a softball question.

Gilmore >>>>>>>>>>> Peterson

According to what?

 

[big dog cowboy]

According to what?

Which one will wear a Star next season?

 

[darthseinfeld]

Which one will wear a Star next season?

So thats how you judge who the better player is?

 

[T-RO]

[/QUOTE]Cherry picking one play against a top 3 WR.

I'm getting a comparable player and keeping my 5th round pick.

Advantage me.

You are getting a lesser player and still lose the 5th round pick because Peterson was a free agent who will factor into losing a comp pick - likely a 5th rounder in next draft.

No advantage.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Cherry picking one play against a top 3 WR.

You are getting a lesser player and still lose the 5th round pick because Peterson was a free agent who will factor into losing a comp pick - likely a 5th rounder in next draft.

You fail.

Expect Peterson is not the lesser player

 

[T-RO]

This was all I could find.

Cherry picking one play against a top 3 WR. Silly.

 

[TheDude]

Play GM. Which deal would you have done? Let's even say you have to add an extra million to Peterson's deal to make him choose Dallas but for all we know he may not have needed it.


2 years, 15 million for the 32 year old Patrick Peterson.

Or, this for the 32 year old Stephon Gilmore as well as a 5th round comp pick.

both..

you can Never have enough CBs