BouncingCheese
Stay out of my Bidness
- Messages
- 1,704
- Reaction score
- 0
5Stars;1505466 said:Can I blame that on my environment?
:laugh2:
(sorry, I had to take the shot)!
......
5Stars;1505466 said:Can I blame that on my environment?
:laugh2:
(sorry, I had to take the shot)!
That was really cool you man - the world we live in today is everyone loves to laugh at someone's expense and we revel in people's pain and mistakes. The guy who did it must be sick - that should be enough.Vintage;1505120 said:I emailed Florio and told him to keep it quiet.
Whoever did it is plenty embarrassed. And if its made public; his family will share that embarrassment.
And if he has young kids- I can only imagine the level of embarrassment then.
Hopefully PFT will keep its lid shut.
But Florio is going to milk this for what its worth.
WoodysGirl;1505414 said:POSTED 5:22 p.m. EDT, May 21, 2007
IT'S TIME TO NAME NAMES
We've given this matter due consideration. We've pondered. We've deliberated. We've (thanks in advance, Tiki) excogitated.
And we've received more than 600 e-mails from readers in little more than two hours on the topic.
We've decided to disclose the names of the persons involved in the Friday e-mail fiasco.
Here's why. In announcing the new Personal Conduct Policy last month, the NFL pointed out that non-players would be held to an even higher standard than those who wear the uniform: "The standard of socially responsible conduct for NFL employees will be higher. Club and league employees will be held to a higher standard than players. Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the NFL will be subject to discipline, even if not criminal in nature." (Emphasis added.)
It's not for us to decide whether the underlying actions in this case (i.e., the forwarding of a "very hard-core," as one league source described it, pornographic video clip via a team's e-mail system) justifies punishment. But how will the personal conduct policy as applied to non-players have any meaning at all if the issue is ignored?
So in the interests of breaking from an apparent effort by the "real" media to brush this one under the rug in the hopes of scoring points with a new coaching regime, we believe it's fair and appropriate to disclose that (via at least three NFL sources) the e-mail in question was inadvertently sent to multiple high-level team employees and their secretaries by offensive line coach Larry Zierlein of the Pittsburgh Steelers.
The e-mail message had been forwarded to him by Doug Whaley, the Steelers director of personnel. Whaley had received the video from someone outside of the organization, and Whaley forwarded it to multiple other persons, including Zierlein.
Again, it's not for us to decide whether this behavior runs afoul of the new personal conduct policy as applied to coaches and front office personnel. Assuming, however, that the NFL has a written policy regarding the use of company computer equipment for personal endeavors, the use of the steelers.com domain to forward the video in question surely was a violation.
There's also a strong strategic aspect at work here. As one source observed, if the ticket manager had done this, he'd already be out the door. With NFL-level offensive line coaches not readily available to be hired in late May, Zierlein will likely get a pass. Ditto for Whaley, a respected personnel exec and a key contributor to the success of the franchise over the past several years.
And we don't think it's a terminable offense, even though we're certain that other employers in other industries wouldn't think twice about firing someone for this.
With all that said, the case provides an excellent opportunity for the league to educate its employees as to what does (and what does not) amount to a violation of the revised conduct policy. If action is taken, then the conduct was over the line. If no action is taken, then this isn't the kind of stuff that falls within the scope of the murky standard of overall personal behavior.
Hypnotoad;1504740 said:*GASP*Theres pornography on the internet?
Seriously, there are viruses out there that send porn/spam out to all your address book and friend. And all you have to do is have an unpatched windows with no firewall. So what? Thanks PFT for the witch hunt.
Now you're dreaming.BrAinPaiNt;1504760 said:I remember my boss calling me into her office one day and asking me why I sent her an address to a website. I just did not know what to say as I knew I never sent her an address to any site.
Turns out there was a virus in the STATES email system that filtered down to ours. One of the things it did was send out spam emails.
She showed me the site and it was a porn video site:laugh1: Talk about being embarrassed. Funny thing was I was not afraid of getting in trouble about it as she knows I would never send that type of stuff. What scared me was the idea that one time she told me she had a dream that I brought her breakfast in bed.
So here I am thinking that she might wonder if I was hot for her and sent the email:laugh1: .
WoodysGirl;1504734 said:POSTED 9:31 p.m. EDT, May 20, 2007
MISADVENTURES IN E-MAIL
A league source tells us that an assistant coach with an NFL team attempted on Friday to forward a pornographic e-mail.
If his goal was to send it to every General Manager in the league, he was successful.
The list also included their secretaries. Oh, and the Comissioner got it, too.
BrAinPaiNt;1504760 said:I remember my boss calling me into her office one day and asking me why I sent her an address to a website. I just did not know what to say as I knew I never sent her an address to any site.
Turns out there was a virus in the STATES email system that filtered down to ours. One of the things it did was send out spam emails.
She showed me the site and it was a porn video site:laugh1: Talk about being embarrassed. Funny thing was I was not afraid of getting in trouble about it as she knows I would never send that type of stuff. What scared me was the idea that one time she told me she had a dream that I brought her breakfast in bed.
So here I am thinking that she might wonder if I was hot for her and sent the email:laugh1: .
silverbear;1506803 said:Maybe if we ask nice, AdamJT13 will PM us the copy he received...
FuzzyLumpkins;1506837 said:I think Adam is media not league. Thats just me though.
silverbear;1506841 said:That was a joke, Fuzz... a rif on the oft-repeated, playful suggestion that he's really Stephen Jones... well, it was also intended as a compliment for the way he brings things to this board that nobody else possibly could...
FuzzyLumpkins;1506843 said:No i understand that. im just saying that i really do belive that he is affiliated with the media.
He has shown that he can access info from STATS, LLC at will. Only league and media members can do that.
He has made allusions to having a friend in one of the NFL clubs. He also occasionally goes completely out of character and takes shots at DMN reporters but only the nontabloid stuff.
He took a shot at JJT for some typo and when i asked why he chose to go after him when there wre much easier targets like Galloway and Floyd-Engels he started talking about editors. It just seemed odd. Put that with his access to STATS and there we go.