LeonDixson
Illegitimi non carborundum
- Messages
- 12,299
- Reaction score
- 6,808
My question is will there be a new "Roy Williams" type rule; A "no choke hold" rule we can refer to as the James Quirk rule?
FloridaRob;1859360 said:I didn't have a problem with the ref breaking up the fight. I thought he might have been a little excessive but no big deal. I did feel that as soon as Barnett was able to get free from the neck hold, he was going to turn around and swing at the culprit before he had time to realize it was an official. That would have been big trouble.
wastedfluid;1859284 said:It's pretty smart IMO.
Calling a grown man who makes millions more than you do a "boy" is a slap - to yourself, because in todays society.. you're half the man he is.
However, the "boys" filing lawsuits is hilarious - especially if it's for money, because officials can only make so much. But it's even more of a slap in the face - because officials know you can't do anything to them on the field without harsh repercussions. Now, the players are "getting even" - so to speak.
It's absolutely hilarious.
tyke1doe;1859381 said:As an African-American male, I understand the racial connotation behind the term "boy."
But, if the ref said "stop acting like boys" I have no problem with that. So what if they make millions of dollars? If they're acting irresponsibly or childish, the image is that of a boy.
Nick Barnett is just embarrassed a 60-something ref put a rare naked choke on him. If this were the UFC or Pride, Barnett would have tapped out. :laugh2:
tyke1doe;1859381 said:As an African-American male, I understand the racial connotation behind the term "boy."
But, if the ref said "stop acting like boys" I have no problem with that. So what if they make millions of dollars? If they're acting irresponsibly or childish, the image is that of a boy.
Nick Barnett is just embarrassed a 60-something ref put a rare naked choke on him. If this were the UFC or Pride, Barnett would have tapped out. :laugh2:
CrazyCowboy;1859259 said:great read......
Doomsday101;1859390 said:The ref who said was black also so does it lose the connontation?
YoMick;1859367 said:Problems with referee's.
Favre blaming the weather.
Packers should have beat the Cowboys.
what else you got?
Doomsday101;1859390 said:The ref who said was black also so does it lose the connontation?
tyke1doe;1859403 said:Yes it does. It's the same as using the "N" word. It has a different meaning when used by a white person.
But that weather didn't stop Bears from scoring. :shrug:FloridaRob;1859401 said:Weather was a factor.
03EBZ06;1859410 said:But that weather didn't stop Bears from scoring. :shrug:
03EBZ06;1859410 said:But that weather didn't stop Bears from scoring. :shrug:
Doomsday101;1859406 said:It has a different meaning or is it taken differently?