Rayman70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 33,793
- Reaction score
- 32,373
an edit...he's over the 50 but NOT the blue line/neutral zone. STILL NOT A PENALTY.Just isn't.Did you want to re-write that statement?
an edit...he's over the 50 but NOT the blue line/neutral zone. STILL NOT A PENALTY.Just isn't.Did you want to re-write that statement?
Blasphemy, only the losing team is allowed to complain, because the fix is in and all that.We got away with no more than the Saints did. Hence, why it's perfectly fine to complain, for both teams, to demand better officiating.
You can't miss obvious calls like a helmet to helmet on Kamara or a facemask on Dak or this offsides.
Hmmm. People must not have seen the photo and are just sticking to their original points. Let me post it again.
an edit...he's over the 50 but NOT the blue line/neutral zone. STILL NOT A PENALTY.Just isn't.
The officiating was bad for both teams.
Beastly should not have had that first down.
Troy and Buck was talking about J Smith with the helmet to helmet but failed to mention he did the same thing earlier in the game as well.
If this blue line is accurate, is he in the neutral zone? Look at the ball in relation to the line.
If this blue line is accurate, is he in the neutral zone? Look at the ball in relation to the line.
lOOK where the ball is now..as opposed to his helmet and tell me that's a routine flag.Come on man. Look at the blue line again. How many postings does this take?
Where the ball is before it is snapped is where the neutral zone is. That is one reason a neutral zone infraction should be an easy call. The official is looking down the line where the ball is and should be able to tell if any part of a defender is across it.
That's why I don't completely dismiss that this was an accurate (albeit ticky-tack) call. If the angle we're seeing is skewed any, it can make the player not appear to be across the ball. However, the 50-yard line does give us an accurate measure to use because you can tell that the ball isn't at the 50 and Gregory's hand is. The only questionable part for me is his helmet. Is there an angle that shows it across the ball?
Come on man. Look at the blue line again. How many postings does this take?
If the spot was at the 50, yes he was. If you look at the photo, he's the ONLY Cowboy over the 50, and by good margin. The blue line for the line of scrimmage cannot overlay the white line marker because it needs a green background so that too tells me the LOS was probably the 50.
I'll say it again, that's an illegal formation against the Saints.
If the spot was at the 50, yes he was. If you look at the photo, he's the ONLY Cowboy over the 50, and by good margin. The blue line for the line of scrimmage cannot overlay the white line marker because it needs a green background so that too tells me the LOS was probably the 50.
I hate to admit it, but you're right. His head is over the neutral zone, though I initially thought that it only counts if the hand is over the line.
I don't think it is.. the left tackle's head has to be at the belly of the interior offensive lineman. He is, barely, but he is.I'll say it again, that's an illegal formation against the Saints.
Isn’t LT Bushrod too far off the ball because Randy was blowing by him?THIS IS NOT OBVIOUS OFFSIDES. His helmet must be clearly across the ball for this to be a penalty. IT IS NOT. Look where the ball is and where Gregory is. Refs blew it.