brucekr
Active Member
- Messages
- 476
- Reaction score
- 185
You owe me a cup of coffeeBased on Jerry's previous comments on the Zeke situation, a lifetime ban for Zeke is forthcoming.
You owe me a cup of coffeeBased on Jerry's previous comments on the Zeke situation, a lifetime ban for Zeke is forthcoming.
Based on Jerry's previous comments on the Zeke situation, a lifetime ban for Zeke is forthcoming.
Motions of dismissal are routine in legal cases.Therein lies my issue. Jerry had insider info before and turned out to be wrong. The fact that the NFL filed a motion of dismissal on the Zeke case tells me they are posturing to dig in.
The only good I see on the horizon is Zeke will play against the Giants. But if he still has to serve it at some point this year, I'd prefer he get it over with.
I've heard that...but, just the same, I suspect the NFL is not going to accept Harold's verdict if it goes against them.Motions of dismissal are routine in legal cases.
PFT changed the article name from "good news" to "more news". Recommend changing the post title too before everyone crucifies Jerry for making false promises again, when in fact, he was incorrectly quoted by PFT but since corrected.
I've heard that...but, just the same, I suspect the NFL is not going to accept Harold's verdict if it goes against them.
I read this, I hope Jerry knows what he is talking about. This appears to be out of his hand.
I've heard that...but, just the same, I suspect the NFL is not going to accept Harold's verdict if it goes against them.
I hope you are correct. That is initially what I thought. But I have heard differently.There's nothing they can do if HH rules in favor of Zeke. He is the arbitrator
It is. This is Jerry in the limelight even when he shouldn't be.
I hope you are correct. That is initially what I thought. But I have heard differently.
On another thread this was being discussed...not sure which one. Someone indicated that Goodell doesn't have to accept Harold's ruling and I suspect that is correct. Just as the player has the ability to file for an injunction, I suspect the league has the ability to take similar steps to pursue a suspension. I don't know it to be true, but it sounds credible.There has NEVER NEVER not even one time been an instance in nfl history that the commissioner didn't accept the lowered down suspension from an appeal arbitrator. There is no way around that. Where did you see any differently?
We already know Jerry....Zeke's playing Sunday night......Could we have more current events please?Jerry Jones promises “good news” on Ezekiel Elliott
Posted by Mike Florio on September 5, 2017, 11:22 AM EDT
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/09/05/jerry-jones-promises-good-news-on-ezekiel-elliott/
Getty Images
Jerry Jones promises “good news” on Ezekiel Elliott
Posted by Mike Florio on September 5, 2017, 11:22 AM EDT
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones doesn’t say much (relatively speaking) when it comes to running back Ezekiel Elliott‘s ongoing suspension situation. But when Jones talks, he says plenty.
“I don’t want to make the comment, and I know y’all can imagine with all that we have flying around the courtrooms and the basic hearing rooms,” Jones said when asked about Elliott during his Tuesday visit with 105.3 The Fan in Dallas. “That would be one I’d pass on this morning.”
And then he added this: “I’ll have good news for you as we get into the week.”
It’s unclear what the nature of the good news would be. The best news would be a decision by arbitrator Harold Henderson to overturn the suspension entirely, which would end the situation and allow Elliott to play.
Jones also was asked whether he expects a decision on Tuesday.
So basically this thread title should be changed and thrown in the garbageJerry said "more news" and not "good news"
Jerry said "more news" and not "good news"