Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
You would honestly want one of our scouts to overvalue the Combine? Are you serious?theogt;3284995 said:I hope that wasn't one of our scouts they were quoting.
King never said it was worthless, just that the information gleaned is often overrated.
I believe firmly what this decision maker was quoted. It also helps if people had read the actual article and not the sensationalized PFT writeup (which also avoids saying it is completely without value):
If I told you who this speaker was, you'd all say, "Whoa, we have to listen to this guy. We respect him.'' Just take my word for it. He's legit.
I enjoy the combine. It gives me the chance to meet a lot of players I'll be covering in the future and to see people in the NFL and get team-by-team updates. It's valuable. But it's way overrated in terms of deciding who should get picked where in the draft, and it always will be.
It is a tool. It is information. But there is no reason why a player should be elevated for something not football related. They are not running the 40, doing the 3-cone shuttle or throwing and catching the football in pads.
The interviews are necessary. The players need to be drug tested. The actual player measurements are important as we all know colleges lie about player's height, weight and speed. The workouts can show if small college players can measure up physically to those from bigger schools.
It is not worthless. It is also not the end all be all that should make a grade completed after all the games were played on the field change significantly.
To that extent, the cottage industry that has sprouted up does indeed overrate the spectacle as King stated. And evidence has shown some teams (and scouts) do overvalue workout numbers. Otherwise we would never see the Mike Mamula-type horror stories over the years.