News: PFT: Marriott: NFL interviewed employee, reviewed video in Michael Irvin case

Status
Not open for further replies.

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
I always have time for you!

and hey... I'm just saying
But he's not "mad" or "emotional".
You are, right?... lol
Dude's been breathlessly commenting from the start.
Calling people fanbois and Irvinites, etc... smh
Ah, the internet. Such a cesspool, but here we are... lol
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,946
Reaction score
17,472
Dish what?
Take what?
Anyone who doesn't agree with you is "mad, emotional, etc."

Learn to use "your" and "you're" properly, counselor.
Wouldn't want you to make a mistake on your legal documents.
If you didn't catch the proper use of the word "your" in my sentence, you're dimmer than I thought with trying to argue this case with only half the litigants' accounts of the situation in your arsenal. SMH. Or is it lower case smh? Lol.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,152
Reaction score
38,759
I can imagine it going in any direction possible.
You seem to be having trouble with that.
Anything is possible . But what is more likely based on their history?

Do we have any history of this employee making false or fabricated complaints ?
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
That’s your defense ? Lol

Not much good happens after 2am.

But Irvin might have been better off if that was his comment to 105.3:)
I'm not in defense of anything. I didn't do anything wrong.
You seem to equate having drinks with being falling down drunk. There is quite a difference.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,152
Reaction score
38,759
I'm not in defense of anything. I didn't do anything wrong.
You seem to equate having drinks with being falling down drunk. There is quite a difference.
No, that’s your interpretation of “been out drinking” which were my words.

And you certainly sound defensive of Irvin.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
But that was from a hooker wasn’t it not an employee of the Marriott.
Firstly, it's not a Marriott. They announced that they only lease their name in their first move to separate themselves from the lawsuit.
Secondly, you have a very high respect level for hotel employees.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
If you didn't catch the proper use of the word "your" in my sentence, you're dimmer than I thought with trying to argue this case with only half the litigants' accounts of the situation in your arsenal. SMH. Or is it lower case smh? Lol.
I see it now.
Just getting used to your feminine screeching about how anyone with a conflicting view is MAD or EMOTIONAL.
An Irvinite fanboi.

Newsflash. Your comments suggest you are the upset one. Nobody else really cares but you and two other posters. The rest of us won't be the least bit surprised no matter which way the story ends.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
Fun Prediction:
Michael Irvin wins the case against the "not" Marriott Hotel. As part of the ruling, he gains ownership of this
hotel and renames it The Playmaker 88 Hotel.
It becomes a brothel and the Head Madame ends up
being..... the hotel employee that started it all.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,946
Reaction score
17,472
I see it now.
Just getting used to your feminine screeching about how anyone with a conflicting view is MAD or EMOTIONAL.
An Irvinite fanboi.

Newsflash. Your comments suggest you are the upset one. Nobody else really cares but you and two other posters. The rest of us won't be the least bit surprised no matter which way the story ends.
Well, happy to be of service. And no. I've debated with people who have conflicting views than mine. I welcome that. The only mad ones are those who get activated when I pin another who support their views or just make a good point in general and they chime in with an attack that has nothing to do with discussing the topic at hand because they think it speaks against what they support. So I let them know. You mentioned a mirror a while back. People don't like a reflection when you show them one. And if you show one, you better not have a glass house to be throwing stones. So I also show the glass house.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,152
Reaction score
38,759
Firstly, it's not a Marriott. They announced that they only lease their name in their first move to separate themselves from the lawsuit.
Secondly, you have a very high respect level for hotel employees.
I have respect for any hotel employees without criminal history.

I certainly am not going to place my eggs in the basket like someone with Irvin’s history.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
Well, happy to be of service. And no. I've debated with people who have conflicting views than mine. I welcome that. The only mad ones are those who get activated when I pin another who support their views or just make a good point in general and they chime in with an attack that has nothing to do with discussing the topic at hand because they think it speaks against what they support. So I let them know. You mentioned a mirror a while back. People don't like a reflection when you show them one. And if you show one, you better not have a glass house to be throwing stones. So I also show the glass house.
I doubt you could muster the strength to throw a rock with enough velocity to break my glass house.

You were the one that made posts personal between us and several other members. Now, you're crying victim then pretending to be a tough guy, a gangsta, right?

Stop calling those with differing opinions names.
Then "there won't be none".

By the way, I love my reflection.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
10,657
I have respect for any hotel employees without criminal history.

I certainly am not going to place my eggs in the basket like someone with Irvin’s history.
Hey, I truly don't blame you there.
The odds are probably less than 50/50 in his favor.
I get that, but dude, leave the door cracked open to the possibility, based on current times, that maybe he
could be innocent... or innocentish (humor attempt).
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,946
Reaction score
17,472
I doubt you could muster the strength to throw a rock with enough velocity to break my glass house.

You were the one that made posts personal between us and several other members. Now, you're crying victim then pretending to be a tough guy, a gangsta, right?

Stop calling those with differing opinions names.
Then "there won't be none".

By the way, I love my reflection.
Sure, bro. If I get an attack, I will unload in any way I see fit. Repeat offenses of unrelated quips to the topic are fanboi behavior. THAT'S a personal thing. There's not 1, not 2, but 3 chime ins about me here including yours that had nothing to do with me discussing the case with others before those side gallery comments. I just choose not to ignore and throw a little theorizing that way since they wanted the attention. Don't want to be part of my theories? There's a real simple solution. But repeatedly people can't let go of the past. So neither do I.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,635
Reaction score
44,524
There's history of false allegations against Irvin but you keep omitting that from the conversation.
What does one have to do with the others
I doubt you could muster the strength to throw a rock with enough velocity to break my glass house.

You were the one that made posts personal between us and several other members. Now, you're crying victim then pretending to be a tough guy, a gangsta, right?

Stop calling those with differing opinions names.
Then "there won't be none".

By the way, I love my reflection.
A gangsta? And what are you? A town militia type, luulz
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top