This description is the very opposite of a country club atmosphere. Never has "micro-managed" been equivalent to "country-club". The former implies imposed pressure due to an overhanging accountability.
When the "country club" analogy is applied it speaks directly towards the fiscal impact of contracts and accountability.
There is without question a system where there is a caste system, with haves and have nots. The bigger the contract, the more of an investment (draft choice) on a player, the more they are given leeway. Would a bottom of the roster type get the type of infinite patience afforded to Ratliff? Austin? Then you have a coach, who I think wants to exercise more control, being hamstrung when the owner interjects himself intermittently into the mix. It is like the coach has control over the fringe, but when it comes to making tough choices about the top half of the roster, including starting status, there is an approval process.
To use a Caddyshack analogy, the coach, whomever that is, equates to Lou. Jerry Jones is Judge Smails.