HoleInTheRoof;3186742 said:
McNabb has played in more playoff games. True. He has won more playoff games. True.
But he is arguably the biggest big game choker in the NFL, currently. He never gets called on it because of the Rush Limbaugh backlash... but the fact remains....
He threw a game sealing interception against the Rams in the NFC Championship.
He threw a game sealing interception against the Bucs in the NFC Championship.
He threw three interceptions against the Panthers in the NFC Championships.
He threw three interceptions against the Patriots, and litterally THREW UP on the field, with the game still in reach!
He is the only QB in NFL history to lose 4 NFC Championships.
He has a career QB rating of just 85.9, but in the playoffs, his QB rating drops to 80.1.
He has spent his entire career with the same coaching staff, in the same QB-Friendly dink and dunk WCO, and with a one of the leagues most feared defenses year in and year out. And with his division being mediocre to bad for much of his career.
And despite all of that, he has yet to deliver a Championship.
Big game quarterback, my ***.
McNabb is OVERRATED.
I find it interesting that some of the same things that you point out about McNabb, which you certainly support, are the same things said of Tony Romo. Yet, many Cowboys fans will defend him to the hilt.
Tony Romo in the playoffs, 0-2.
Tony Romo throws a last minute interception in a home playoff game against the Giants.
Tony Romo bobbles the snap that contributed to Dallas losing against Seattle in the playoffs.
And yet Tony Romo has had better weapons at receiver than McNabb and still wasn't able to win a playoff game.
Also, the criticism about Philadelphia has been that the Eagles organization has never given McNabb any weapons. Front office did get T.O., but you know how that went. Oh, and by the way, the Eagles beat the Falcons without T.O.
Please, let's leave Limbaugh's comments out of this. His comments were idiotic and anachronistic. No one is not criticizing McNabb because he's black. He gets his share of criticism.
Furthermore, the Eagles are not the Cowboys. The Cowboys get far more criticism because they are America's Team. They get far more attention too when they're winning, even if they don't get to the Super Bowl.
That's just the way it is.
Do you think any other young quarterback would have gotten the attention Romo got in his first year with ESPN/NFL Network doing a special segment on "Who is Tony Romo?" Do you think if Romo were in Philly, he would have got such attention?
Moreover, McNabb is similar to Danny White and John Elway in his early years. He's the same as Peyton Manning before he actually won a Super Bowl.
The NFL measures greatest by winning. Until Romo wins a Super Bowl, he'll be seen as a loser. Until McNabb wins a Super Bowl, he will be seen as a loser. Is it fair? No. But that's the way it is.
Oh, and as far as the article, McNabb's big-game history does favor him over Romo's. Do you dispute this?
P.S. I wouldn't call any quarterback who led his team to 5 NFC Championship Games overrated. If that's the case, then every quarterback who falls short of the Super Bowl or Super Bowl win could be considered overrated including greats like Dan Fouts, Dan Marino, Drew Brees, Jim Kelly, etc.