sorry soldier, that was with four minutes on the clock. Aaron Rodgers would have went back down and scored and won so nice try.
4th & 2. Beasley coming across the middle for first down versus Dez running for the endzone. That right there is Tony Romo's Legacy. If it's third down, I'm 100% for that pass. But not on fourth down with your entire season at stake.Soldier? Ok
If, as you suggest that's what would've happened. Would you have put that loss on Romo? He put his team in position to win. Demarco Murray fumbled away a sure touchdown and the defense couldn't pressure Rogers all game despite him hobbling around on a bad calf. Yet Romo put his team in a position to win but yeah, for sure put that on Romo and use it to show how he can't win. The logic of your argument is astounding.
4th & 2. Beasley coming across the middle for first down versus Dez running for the endzone. That right there is Tony Romo's Legacy. If it's third down, I'm 100% for that pass. But not on fourth down with your entire season at stake.
He made a low-percentage play, and went home.And yet he made a perfect pass.
He made a low-percentage play, and went home.
It's not the smart play.He made a perfect throw to his best player in single coverage. That's the best play.
It's not the smart play.
And that's why we have no Super Bowls in 20 years. Smart quarterback play is how you get to , and win Super Bowls.We disagree
And that's why we have no Super Bowls. Smart quarterback play is how you get to come and win Super Bowls.
And that's why we have no Super Bowls in 20 years. Smart quarterback play is how you get to , and win Super Bowls.
I understand, but you are also making comments that there is NO WAY Dak is as good a QB as Romo is now. That's completely false. I can bring up all kinds of stats/videos, etc... To prove you are wrong. Not saying this as a slam on Romo but he never was as good as Rookie Dak. Everyone saying Romo would be blowing every team out by 30... I have one question for you.
Why has he never advanced to an NFC title game his entire career? As a rookie, it took Dak all of 7 games to have us dominating the NFC.
Tell that to Green Bay and new England.I would argue that great running games, great defenses and opportunistic offenses are how you get to and win Super Bowls.
10 years.Really? That's why? It isn't the lack of talent around the qb? If everyone on that team played as well as Romo we would have multiple super bowls. Too much blame and too much credit.
Look up Romo's first six games as compared to Dak. I've seen it posted but - he's actually a little better.
It's not the Dallas Daks and it's not the Dallas Romos - it's the Dallas Cowboys and there are no losers in this scenario.
He made a low-percentage play, and went home.
Tell that to Green Bay and new England.
He went home because as always - his defense let him down again. Brady has thrown 3 INT's in TWO separate AFC Championship games and never went home because he won them both - funny how that whole "team" thing works.
Brady''s been to a lot of Super Bowls, nice try.He went home because as always - his defense let him down again. Brady has thrown 3 INT's in TWO separate AFC Championship games and never went home because he won them both - funny how that whole "team" thing works.
Tom Brady fans have Super Bowls. Tony Romo fans have excusesNew England? The same Pats with a defensive genius as head coach? That New England? Truth be told, the Pats would have two more if they didn't run into a team that fit my description to a tee