THUMPER
Papa
- Messages
- 9,522
- Reaction score
- 61
Pittman4Two said:So, there you have it my friends. An unbiased ranking list of the NFL League.
Unbiased? uh... yeah... whatever you say dude.
Pittman4Two said:So, there you have it my friends. An unbiased ranking list of the NFL League.
Pittman4Two said:I'll try and weed through your prose, my friend. I seriously think the Saints are the surprise team of 2006. Why? Better QB depth. Brooks will continue his progression while tutoling Drew Brees. Jim Haslett left a foundation for Sean Payton to build upon. Look at McCallister, although I'd like him to work on his tackling techniques, he still has a motor that runs well like an oiled machine. You heard it here first.
Do they not? Let's remember this is the Greatest Show on Turf. I'm expecting a drop off...really, I am...but I'm leaving a little window there for Marshall and the boys to return to glory.
Tampa Bay < Pittsburgh Stealers
Tampa Bay < New England
Tampa Bay < Indianapolis
Tampa Bay < Seattle
Sure, these are my opinions but we have a young QB, RB, TE, WR and LS that are being molded in Jon's vision. What better vision is there to have?
Quincy was on a lot of Cowboys fans' minds. His impressive record as a starter was only hindered by the W-L numbers. Take a look at his numbers when the Cowboys put a W in the win column. You'll see why Drew Bledsoe is now a worry-free quarterback. I'll have to take your word that Carter is now out of the CFL.
Did you not read that Jimmy Smith retired? Did you not read that Mike Pearson is still injured? C'mon...try to keep up.
Pittman4Two said:Better QB depth. Brooks will continue his progression while tutoling Drew Brees.
ESPECIALLY when it has already been pointed out about 20 times in this thread that it is a joke. C'mon now guys, even if you were too thick to get it right off the bat, reading the thread would hopefully knock some sense into you.RCowboyFan said:Oh, boy, this board never fails to amaze me, on how some posters will never get a clear attempt at humor and start arguing seriously
RCowboyFan said:Oh, boy, this board never fails to amaze me, on how some posters will never get a clear attempt at humor and start arguing seriously
dargonking999 said:lol this board agues seriously about any and everything, humor non humor, shoot if i started a thread about the grass growing, they'd start arguing about how the sun stops the grass from growing, vs the sun making the grass grow.
man i love this board lol
RCowboyFan said:And yet you are the first in line to do that eh? At least remove your post before pretending that you got the humor immediately
http://dallascowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=915620&postcount=39
RCowboyFan said:Damn you are almost as good as Chief, the resident satirist Welcome to the forum btw.
Pittman4Two said:Om, as in THE Om?
Om, I'm glad you cleared that up. I was and a little uke:Om said:Guilty as charged. And don't change the subject.
Pittman wasn't in.
Om said:Guilty as charged. And don't change the subject.
Pittman wasn't in.
Pittman4Two said:So, there you have it my friends. An unbiased ranking list of the NFL League.
Thoughts?
Pittman4Two said:Pittman was always in. Alstott on the other hand...not so much.
Om said:I was having drinks with MRS. Pittman the other day, and she confided how she's always having to ask MR. Pittman if he's in or not.
So you can understand the confusion.
Om said:Eh, Pittman, Alstott ... who can tell those pewter puffy-shirts apart? Besides, I was having drinks with MRS. Pittman the other day, and she confided how she's always having to ask MR. Pittman if he's in or not.
So you can understand the confusion.
Om said:Eh, Pittman, Alstott ... who can tell those pewter puffy-shirts apart? Besides, I was having drinks with MRS. Pittman the other day, and she confided how she's always having to ask MR. Pittman if he's in or not.
So you can understand the confusion.
Hostile said:I can't wait for the square off thread Pittman4Two vs. LeotisBrown.
Now that's what we want to get our popcorn ready.