Pitts, Surtain II or Farley? Who's the Cowboy?

A lot of people saying this, but Denver would be pretty stupid to go corner when they don't have a quarterback.
That's if a QB is there or if they were unable to trade up for one.
 
That's if a QB is there or if they were unable to trade up for one.
Yea, I guess I don't mean to say it's unlikely that they take a corner, but more that I don't see how that would be their preference. Even if they think Farley is Champ Bailey, they have to realize that corner there isn't getting them any closer to being a contender than they were at this point last year.
 
Yea, I guess I don't mean to say it's unlikely that they take a corner, but more that I don't see how that would be their preference. Even if they think Farley is Champ Bailey, they have to realize that corner there isn't getting them any closer to being a contender than they were at this point last year.
Quite honestly, I think teams could wait on the position as the depth should be real good in rd 2. The talent drop-off isn't as big as many think.
 
Quite honestly, I think teams could wait on the position as the depth should be real good in rd 2. The talent drop-off isn't as big as many think.
Yea, that too. No way I'm taking a corner at 10.
 
I think Surtain will be the only one available when Dallas picks, so they probably draft Etienne because Dallas.
 
If you think Pitts’ comp is Gronkowski you’re silly.

More like Shannon Sharpe, which wouldn't be a bad thing either.

As much as we need one of those CBs it would be hard for me to pass on Pitts. I almost hope he's gone before 10 so it's an easy decision.

If by some miracle Sewell falls into our laps I'll find a CB later.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,968
Messages
13,907,807
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top