Cowboyny
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,917
- Reaction score
- 19,115
That's if a QB is there or if they were unable to trade up for one.A lot of people saying this, but Denver would be pretty stupid to go corner when they don't have a quarterback.
That's if a QB is there or if they were unable to trade up for one.A lot of people saying this, but Denver would be pretty stupid to go corner when they don't have a quarterback.
Yea, I guess I don't mean to say it's unlikely that they take a corner, but more that I don't see how that would be their preference. Even if they think Farley is Champ Bailey, they have to realize that corner there isn't getting them any closer to being a contender than they were at this point last year.That's if a QB is there or if they were unable to trade up for one.
Quite honestly, I think teams could wait on the position as the depth should be real good in rd 2. The talent drop-off isn't as big as many think.Yea, I guess I don't mean to say it's unlikely that they take a corner, but more that I don't see how that would be their preference. Even if they think Farley is Champ Bailey, they have to realize that corner there isn't getting them any closer to being a contender than they were at this point last year.
Yea, that too. No way I'm taking a corner at 10.Quite honestly, I think teams could wait on the position as the depth should be real good in rd 2. The talent drop-off isn't as big as many think.
back and forth Im back with Pitts [if he falls to us] combined with trading Gallup for a second. The second round has some good prospects.Inquire minds want to know..
Or another Diggs.Maybe we’ll get lucky and find another Awuzie.
If you think Pitts’ comp is Gronkowski you’re silly.