Players Cowboys show interest in 2022 draft

Toledo defensive backs showed out at pro day
26 teams were on hand for the Toledo Pro Day, including defensive back coaches from the Bengals and Dallas Cowboys.

Safety Tycen Anderson stood on his Combine 40 time (4.36) but touched 37 inches in the vertical jump. The Dallas Cowboys, a team in eternal need of a safety, could look towards Anderson on Day 3.

Toldeo’s other defensive back, Sam Womack, looked very good. Slight of size, he measured 5’9 1/2″, 190 pounds, touched 36 inches in the vertical jump, and 9’10” in the broad jump.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/...ile-the-jets-show-interest-in-trevor-penning/
 
reddyuta said:
i have a feeling that they got burnt last year when they telegraphed their interest in the 2 CBs,Defense still need major upgrades across the board.
Click to expand...

We ended up with the best player in the whole draft. Plus Diggs turned out to be a great CB1. I don’t consider that burnt. Maybe they not as dumb as we all think they are and threw up CB smoke screens. I know wishful thinking.
 
Vinnie2u said:
We ended up with the best player in the whole draft. Plus Diggs turned out to be a great CB1. I don’t consider that burnt. Maybe they not as dumb as we all think they are and threw up CB smoke screens. I know wishful thinking.
Click to expand...

On first reading that i'd say we didnt use a 'smoke-screen', as CB was the primary need in 2021.....but we trusted 'our board' and took the star, but had to double down at CB hence taking Joseph at 44 and Wright 99. Luckily Brown and Diggs stepped up which negated the need for Wright or Joseph to plug and play.

There are similarities this year. For Surtain and Horn replace Green and Johnson. Now there's a chance one of those doesnt fall to us (or a cant pass talent falls to us which we have to take), but unlike last year we dont have an alternative, there just isnt a viable LG on the roster.....and we saw how a deficient LG helped kill the whole line down the stretch.

Then again I havent heard that we're OTT high on either Green or Johnson and you may be right it could be a 'smoke-screen' fuelled by fans and media who put together the need with the value at 24??

Looking at Bruglar's Top 100 we may prefer Kinnard (42) or Salyer (49) both physique/maulers over technique which probably project them as Guards over Tackle in the NFL.

What I would guess, if we dont get Green or Johnson we definitely use at least one of our 5's to move up and ensure we get one of the alternatives in the 40's, or if we havent got a preference (and no high 1 Grade is available), i'm happy in this deep 2nd round to trade down.
 
CowboyoWales said:
On first reading that i'd say we didnt use a 'smoke-screen', as CB was the primary need in 2021.....but we trusted 'our board' and took the star, but had to double down at CB hence taking Joseph at 44 and Wright 99. Luckily Brown and Diggs stepped up which negated the need for Wright or Joseph to plug and play.

There are similarities this year. For Surtain and Horn replace Green and Johnson. Now there's a chance one of those doesnt fall to us (or a cant pass talent falls to us which we have to take), but unlike last year we dont have an alternative, there just isnt a viable LG on the roster.....and we saw how a deficient LG helped kill the whole line down the stretch.

Then again I havent heard that we're OTT high on either Green or Johnson and you may be right it could be a 'smoke-screen' fuelled by fans and media who put together the need with the value at 24??

Looking at Bruglar's Top 100 we may prefer Kinnard (42) or Salyer (49) both physique/maulers over technique which probably project them as Guards over Tackle in the NFL.

What I would guess, if we dont get Green or Johnson we definitely use at least one of our 5's to move up and ensure we get one of the alternatives in the 40's, or if we havent got a preference (and no high 1 Grade is available), i'm happy in this deep 2nd round to trade down.
Click to expand...

For the first time in a long time I’m with the best player available regardless of position crowd. We have needs but not obvious needs. Pick 24 is way different than picks 1-10. Talent infusion is needed. But I think it’s going to come down to DE or OL…
 
Vinnie2u said:
For the first time in a long time I’m with the best player available regardless of position crowd. We have needs but not obvious needs. Pick 24 is way different than picks 1-10. Talent infusion is needed. But I think it’s going to come down to DE or OL…
Click to expand...

Yep, looking at the Devonte Adams trade (where the Raiders lost the 22nd pick), I can only possibly see the Chargers taking a Guard in front of us, and it's quite possible that there would be a Tackle available at 17 in any case.

If both Green and Johnson were available at 24 i'd be seriously considering trading down (especially with the possibility of Kinnard and Salyer available in the second round).

We need a Guard, but as you say we need an infusion of talent throughout the roster and Guard is hardly a position of skill (especially as it appears there are a number of 'failed' Tackles that could plug and play).
 
Gaede said:
I'm very interested in Green at 24.
Click to expand...

On the face of it so would I, however, if there are 4 Guards projected in the top 50 , why take the player who plays a non prime-position, from a player that didnt do himself any favors in the combine (in my eyes that not a great concern) and where the likelihood is that the position could be filled later on in the 2nd round.
 
CowboyoWales said:
On the face of it so would I, however, if there are 4 Guards projected in the top 50 , why take the player who plays a non prime-position, from a player that didnt do himself any favors in the combine (in my eyes that not a great concern) and where the likelihood is that the position could be filled later on in the 2nd round.
Click to expand...

Totally get that line of thinking. But if he's higher rated than the others on the board, it's an easy decision. Can't worry about the other rounds, can only deal with the one you're in. I feel like thinking you'll get a similar player in a different round due to depth is a tact too reliant on hope, guesswork. Would rather not get cute and just take the guy that's there.
 
Gaede said:
Totally get that line of thinking. But if he's higher rated than the others on the board, it's an easy decision. Can't worry about the other rounds, can only deal with the one you're in. I feel like thinking you'll get a similar player in a different round due to depth is a tact too reliant on hope, guesswork. Would rather not get cute and just take the guy that's there.
Click to expand...

If the Chargers take one of Green or Johnson at 17 and we have a gap to Kinnard and Salyer then totally agree we have to take the remaining Guard. The issue is where we have a number of (much) higher grades players available and potentially 3 of the above Guards still available and little difference between them on our board.

It's the classic Position of Need vrs BPA, but this time the real value is potentially found in Rd 2 (and even Rd 3)
 
Could they be looking at Breece Hall from Iowa ST or would they be there for Kolar?
 
This team blows another top pick in a RB we riot. They already have a really good one they don't even use
 
Not sure if it’s the most reliable source, but saw this…

“HuskerOnline also learned that the Dallas Cowboys are expected to bring in Jurgens for a private visit in the coming days.”
https://nebraska.rivals.com/news/nebraska-pro-day-notebook-cam-jurgens-steals-the-show

Would be very excited about this. Jurgens could possibly push for the starting C day 1. His movement ability at the C position might rival Jason Kelce.

Don’t ask me what this drill is but kinda fun to watch a 300 pound man do it

 
Imo Green is their number one target,they have made no moves on the Ol and i know they already dont think much of Mcgovern,
 
tm1119 said:
Not sure if it’s the most reliable source, but saw this…

“HuskerOnline also learned that the Dallas Cowboys are expected to bring in Jurgens for a private visit in the coming days.”
https://nebraska.rivals.com/news/nebraska-pro-day-notebook-cam-jurgens-steals-the-show

Would be very excited about this. Jurgens could possibly push for the starting C day 1. His movement ability at the C position might rival Jason Kelce.

Don’t ask me what this drill is but kinda fun to watch a 300 pound man do it

Click to expand...


Definitely keeping an eye on him. Where does he go though? Ive seen him anywhere from 3-5
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 622 (members: 41, guests: 581)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,507
Messages
13,879,748
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top