windward
NFL Historian
- Messages
- 18,681
- Reaction score
- 4,533
That's what I was just about to ask.
I had a config where Seattle, Detroit, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Dallas finished 10-6 and the playoff simulator has Seattle winning the tie-break against us.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/mac...0554361~2~400554446~1~400554411~1~400554401~1
Here's their explanation...
If you click through to their write-up of the tiebreaker criteria, head-to-head is the first determining factor if it's a tie between two teams outside of a division. But it seems like they are not applying that when it's a tie between 3 or more teams in different divisions.
If I'm reading it right, they're ignoring head-to-head until later in the tie breaking criteria. The in-division tiebreaker happens first, then wildcard.
So if Seattle is seeded ahead of San Francisco on the division tiebreaker and San Francisco is seeded ahead of Dallas in the wildcard tiebreaker, then (I think) Dallas cannot be seeded ahead of Seattle. Or they're just applying the tiebreaker incorrectly.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?page=tiebreakers
It's incorrect as far as I know. I'm pretty sure when determining wild card seeds you apply division tiebreakers first then you take the teams left over and apply wild card tiebreaker. In a scenario where Seattl is ahead of the Niners we should be the five seed. If the Niners were ahead of Seattle we should be the 6 seed.
I also found another glitch where the Colts and Pats finished with the same record ( nobody else had that record) yet the Colts were the higher seed. So it seems a tad glitchy.
EDIT for link: http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures
Looks like I'm right and ESPN is wrong here.