Eh...it's more an indication of wanting to upgrade the secondary. I hate polls that have 20 difference choices, because the results become less meaningful. O-line are lumped together as are the linebacker positions.BLT;1430423 said:i dont like how safety and CB are together.. while id be ok with a CB being taken.. i would hate a FS being taken... im basically ok with either WR or CB in the 1st round as long as the 2nd round is the 1 we dont take.. probably id go WR 1st round like a mechem or a bowe and then in the 2nd id take eric wright..
Umm....because I only wanted realistic choices.smarta5150;1430441 said:How about RB???
theogt;1430444 said:Umm....because I only wanted realistic choices.
superpunk;1430450 said:Best value appears to be at WR.
But if a stud RB drops again, I'll be distraught if we pass it up.
Again.
Yeah, there's about a 1% chance Lynch falls past Green Bay and about a .00001% chance he falls past New York.smarta5150;1430452 said:Who would be a "stud" that may fall to us?
theogt;1430454 said:Yeah, there's about a 1% chance Lynch falls past Green Bay and about a .00001% chance he falls past New York.
I think he'll be a very productive back in the NFL. He'll be a Steven Jackson or a Rudi Johnson type back -- always productive and in the top 10, but never a top 3 or 4 like LT, LJ, or SA.smarta5150;1430455 said:I didnt even know he was considered a "stud."
I thought the only stud was AP.