kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 48,633
- Reaction score
- 51,402
CalPoly wants us to take a TE.If this team drafts another OL in the 1st round I’ll jump off a bridge.
CalPoly wants us to take a TE.If this team drafts another OL in the 1st round I’ll jump off a bridge.
Kelvin Banks Jr would be a great pick.If this team drafts another OL in the 1st round I’ll jump off a bridge.
That would be highly unlikely.If this team drafts another OL in the 1st round I’ll jump off a bridge.
I think they should trade out of the first round altogether. The strength of the draft is the second and third rounds. Trade the first pick get an extra 2nd and 3rd plus 1st for the 2026 draft that will be much stronger at the top. Defensive tackles and running backs will be plentiful in the 2nd/third rounds.There most likely won't be a BPA.
The more I think about it - Banks may be the answer. Steele seems to have falling off the perverbial cliff.Kelvin Banks Jr would be a great pick.
Lol.CalPoly wants us to take a TE.
Banks is a stud but he might be a Guard. Hard for me to justify the pick if that’s the case.The more I think about it - Banks may be the answer. Steele seems to have falling off the perverbial cliff.
June 1st cut, Guyton back to RT and we have our Oline and good backups. And we save money for some FA's as well !
This pick makes sense only if the DT and Dr's are gone already.
To many offensive line weak teams in front of us to get Banks. We might be able to get the Ohio Stare left tackle coming off of a knee injury though. The YouTubers are saying he is best tackle in the draft.Banks is a stud but he might be a Guard. Hard for me to justify the pick if that’s the case.
We already used a 1st rd pick on a guard, we do not need another oneBanks is a stud but he might be a Guard. Hard for me to justify the pick if that’s the case.
That will be the multimillion dollar question, hard no if they project him as a guard.Banks is a stud but he might be a Guard. Hard for me to justify the pick if that’s the case.
San Francisco and Chicago are the landing spots for Banks that are in front of us.We already used a 1st rd pick on a guard, we do not need another one
Jerry just signed Dak and CeeDee to record breaking contracts. The dumbest thing you can do is treat this draft like a rebuild. Take BPA. You can’t go wrong picking the best player.I think you have to go into this draft in a rebuild mentality. You will lose stars as fast as you replace them in the draft over the next few years. So guys like Jeanty are a waste for a team losing Martin, DLaw, Dak to age. You gotta go with positions that have longevity and have high blue chip potential. DT, OL, TE, S, QB maybe WR
BPA in one year could be a 3rd round grade in another.Jerry just signed Dak and CeeDee to record breaking contracts. The dumbest thing you can do is treat this draft like a rebuild. Take BPA. You can’t go wrong picking the best player.
Let’s make it simple for you. If Jeanty is there at 12 the Cowboys should pick him. Most draft nicks have him as a top 5 player in this draft. There is not one scout that would have the kid in the third round. The Cowboys get better immediately because they would add a playmaker to the offense.BPA in one year could be a 3rd round grade in another.
I get that that in most years things are fairly equal...I just think there are scenarios where this BPA ideology is wrong and that you are better off going by position...even in the first round. Or trade out.
I get that its safe...but it isnt bullet-proof, and there are areas to take calculated risks on a need over BPA that I think could elevate a team. Maybe it takes more brain power or compute to pull off...but nothing too hard.
Supposedly this is a terrible WR class. Why would I take a WR as my FRP if he has an historic 3rd round grade, but is considered BPA? Im sure you can knock holes in this with "Well, something is off if a WR that is considered BPA at FRP #16 is considered BPA over all positions but is considered a 3rd round pick most other drafts"
But is doesnt work that way
We have to use free agency. There is no way around it. We literally have to replace 50% of the roster.Correct me if im wrong, but going into the offseason our only main players signed along the DL are:
Micah
Sam
Mazi
Kneeland
DL is a massive need, especially if Jerry skips free agency again.
Only RB signed is Vaughn.
At corner, diggs is injured and JLew is a free agent.
Linebacker, Overshown is injured and EK was a 1 year rental. I think this season showed we expect very little from Damone Clark.
So at this point and time, I would watch for DL, RB, CB and LB.
Yeah, but does Jerry sign 10 year vets on their last leg or younger players who still have a future in this league.We have to use free agency. There is no way around it. We literally have to replace 50% of the roster.
Well they better be ready for the heat they will get. I don’t think they can blame anyone now. Dak and McCarthy have always been the buffer. The Eagles improvement after using free agency and hiring real assistant coaches has pointed the bullseye right at the Joneses.Yeah, but does Jerry sign 10 year vets on their last leg or younger players who still have a future in this league.
Stephen hinted it would be SOS.
thats not what i proposed though. i agree with you.Let’s make it simple for you. If Jeanty is there at 12 the Cowboys should pick him. Most draft nicks have him as a top 5 player in this draft. There is not one scout that would have the kid in the third round. The Cowboys get better immediately because they would add a playmaker to the offense.