Boyzmamacita
CowBabe Up!!!
- Messages
- 29,125
- Reaction score
- 64,307
Glad it didn''t backfire.
If the booth can just review it, why is there an on-field review?
If the booth can just review it, why is there an on-field review?
They can't have the refs going over to review on the sidelines after every turnover just in case. You know how much time that would take. When they can just ha e New York do it quicker and if there's an issue then they go over and review it themselves.
That throw in the 1st half into triple coverage to Lamb was thing of beauty. It was a rope! Romo said it should've been intercepted but Lamb got scared of a big hit and alligator armed it. Romo and the other guy was OBVIOUSLY pulling for the Lions.
There were 5 today...lol and if they ran over to the monitors after every one it for sure would've been noticed and nerve wracking.It would take slightly more than it already takes. How many reviewable turnovers are there per game? Adding another 1 or 2 stoppages wouldn't even be noticed.
Is that supposed to be an answer? Should we do away entirely with on-field reviews?
There were 5 today...lol and if they ran over to the monitors after every one it for sure would've been noticed and nerve wracking.
I'm waiting for it.
The ironic part of that was, Romo used to throw those type of pass(into triple coverage) all the time. The difference was, he had Dez who came down with them more often than not.
And before someone accuses me of being a Romo basher. I supported Romo back then just like I support Dak now.
Here's the thing...some are not questionable and some are. The Diggs INT certainly was.