Twitter: Post Game Tweets 10/23/2022

How did they fail, he caught the ball and they saw no issue. New York didn't fail. What's so hard to understand?

It was ruled he caught the ball and it should have been reviewed. If the review showed he caught the ball, then he caught the ball. That was definitely close enough to garner a review. I don't understand how you can't at least admit that a review should have occurred. Questionable possession going to the ground is almost ALWAYS reviewed.
 
just insane what the officials and the nfl front office is doing with this ruffing the passer penalty rules. it needs to stop it is going to cost alot of teams games in the future maybe decide a playoff game screw a team over.

Saw a few of these today including a crucial one in the Giants-Jags game. What bothers me is they did not call the hit on Rush last week by Graham, but I saw two just like that today in different games called.
 
It was ruled he caught the ball and it should have been reviewed. If the review showed he caught the ball, then he caught the ball. That was definitely close enough to garner a review. I don't understand how you can't at least admit that a review should have occurred. Questionable possession going to the ground is almost ALWAYS reviewed.

If you guys are arguing about the Diggs INT, it was reviewed according to Dan Campbell. The refs told him it was reviewed and they saw no evidence it was not a catch.
 
Except that Zeke is useless outside the tackles, but they keep wasting downs running him there.

He actually had a pretty good run to the outside on a designed play. The play he had to bounce outside because of defenders crashing the middle didn't stand a chance. Of course, Pollard also had a short yardage play to the outside that went nowhere.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,038
Messages
13,785,431
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top