Zeke may not miss a game this year, but he may serve the 6 next season. The process seems to be unfair to Zeke. The commissioner's power should be on the players mind when this contract is up.
The problem is incompetence. It is not hard to set up a fair and transparent process with specific instructions for punishment across the board. It's incompetence.The players make more money by giving this power to Goodell. I don't think the 1600 players will give up $ because 30 or so guys get suspended each year. The issue is Goodell's use and interpretation of the discipline guidelines in the CBA. The NFL needs to stay away from social issues and investigations. Let the law do what the law does.
That is kind of chicken and the egg...... not one person has ever watched a game because of GoodellThe players make more money by giving this power to Goodell. I don't think the 1600 players will give up $ because 30 or so guys get suspended each year. The issue is Goodell's use and interpretation of the discipline guidelines in the CBA. The NFL needs to stay away from social issues and investigations. Let the law do what the law does.
I read enough of the posts to say that including ABQ in that group is unfair.
I read enough of the posts to say that including ABQ in that group is unfair.
I've got no problem with dissenting opinions. It's part of what makes this place great. As long as you own it when you're wrong. Lord knows I've shown my backside more times than I'm comfortable with.I read enough of the posts to say that including ABQ in that group is unfair.
We already had him for 2016? I assume you meant 2017
Here's the problem with that: If you ask the union reps "Are you in favor of taking away Goodell's authority to discipline players under Article 46?" then all 32 of them are going to say "Yes."Rumors are that a majority of the Team reps to the Union are very much in favor of castrating Goodell as regards discipline in the next CBA.