Prescott on George Pickens

[MarcusRock]

Go reread... No wait ..I've learned that's too challenging for some of you here I'll provide it ...

See, you cherry picked one year one obscure stat chosen to prove a false point. In my reply to that I start off saying as long as you keep 2023 on your radar too.

I realize reading comprehension gets in the way of agendas, but please do be better about it, you may actually learn something and grow from it.

Lol. No, I noticed something over a period of years and then did my OWN research to see if it was true, and it was. You were like "No, no, look away, how about this" when it was not the same as I stated and had researched. Then you say:

Dak played poorly last season Im not sure anyone can honestly say he didn't.

So when I posted what I noticed Dak did poorly and used 2024 data to back it up, why'd you go into batspit crazy denial mode and try to switch to a stat you pretended answered what I stated? Who was "trying" something there? Not me. I don't think you even know what the hell you believe.

The 2024 data is the most recent data but it's what I've noticed for years. I'm talking game-changing deep, deep passes and not some 20+ air yards that tell you nothing about how far down field that is if you're passing from 15 yards behind the LOS. That's what you call a TE special.

So for balls that end up 30+ yards beyond the LOS, do you have a pre-packaged stat you didn't research or vet that you can golden retrieve to show Dak actually is good at that? If not, then remain on the sidelines.

 

[nalam]

He's right.

"You put the football anywhere in his vicinity..."

He has a wide catch radius.

Its a great add.

And Dak wants all his WRs to have Wide catch radius as his delivery accuracy is not consistent, Lamb has stone hands and drops too many balls but caught several knowing he would be hammered after. Dont know about Pickens for this aspect.

We can see why Dak is happy, he needs all the help he can get as he is not instinctive QB .

 

[Gambit]

Lol. No, I noticed something over a period of years and then did my OWN research to see if it was true, and it was. You were like "No, no, look away, how about this" when it was not the same as I stated and had researche

You chose 1 year. Over a whole 9 year career. If at all possible, answer that yes or no, you used 1 year, right?

What I offered was a contrast of the year prior, and then his whole career, because you see it's a whole body of work that matters when say someone is good or bad at something, not just 1/9th of what they've put on tape.

You're inability to grasp that shows your agenda. And exposes yourself.

So when I posted what I noticed Dak did poorly and used 2024 data to back it up, why'd you go into batspit crazy denial mode and try to switch to a stat you pretended answered what I stated? Who was "trying" something there? Not me. I don't think you even know what the hell you believe.

Batspit crazy denial? No sir you started with a definitive statement. You made no delineations that it was one year you simply said he is not good at it. Then cherry picked one year and an obscure stat that represents less than 2% of all passes thrown by all QBs.

I showed you stats from previous year and over his career to show you're wrong. Live up to that.