CFZ Prescott's interceptions aren't the issue

CCBoy

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,803
Reaction score
22,480
JBS said:
Yeah too bad we weren’t good enough to get there. That’s the point of this argument
Click to expand...
No, the evaluations through the entire NFL, and the media as well, is supportive in the amount of really good talent that is on recent and also the present roster. More meets the eye to all as to current strength on this team, than a disappointed fan's stereotypes of blame.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,929
Reaction score
19,486
leeblair said:
Move on from Dak. Rush proved he was better.
If you're not satisfied with Rush, you can't legitimately be happy with Dak.
If you are not satisfied with Rush, find someone else. Rush was better than Dak.
Click to expand...
Rush didn't prove he was better.

He produced 22nd ranked offense or worse in almost every offensive statistical category. FACTS. So saying he proved is being adorably blind to facts. Fact no team scored 20 points on Cowboys when Rush was QB and we win. The first time a team.scored 20 we lost. FACTS. The defense gave up average of 13.5 points per game during the wins.

Teamsnthat had 22nd ranked offense or worse didn't make the playoffs. FACTS.

so not not satisfied with Rush. And again who you got? Nobody?

I am.100% onboard when there is someone who can produce more and better. Until then Dak is all we got.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,929
Reaction score
19,486
Jipper said:
Sorry but I'm not as optimistic on him as you are..but hey you keep being the mountfanboy you are!!!

He has issues, or you have issues, or you and him have issues
Click to expand...
And you have issues. And leeblair has issues. And brikeback mountain has issues. And pappy has issues. Everyone has issues.

Doesn't change the fact he literally said he wants Dallas to lose. So he I not a fan. If we win he has nothing to post about. Literally he only posts about dak.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,929
Reaction score
19,486
basel90 said:
there is no immediate solution now. dak is about to get extended again at 50 mil plus as the cowboys have neglected this position for so long. all bets are on dak at this stage as determined by jerry . Dak will not win a SB for this team with his passing or running. The only way out is if dak gets hurt ( not wishing this on him ) and the cowboys luck into a trade for a game changing QB who has dynamism. something that the eagles lucked into in 2016 when their starter got hurt, and the 49ers had luck with a back up such as Purdy.
Click to expand...
I agree that we need to draft a QB in top 2 rounds. At least every couple of years. Build a pipeline and try and develop and give yourself options when it's time to renegotiate or have options to make trades. If it doesn't work, then you do it again. Else we are going to get into the post Aikman era of desperation.

That's not on Dak. That's on our stupid GM. He is solely responsible. Even our backup QB position sucks.
 
Mannix

Mannix

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,955
Reaction score
11,299
leeblair said:
Dak has never thrown a lot of interceptions; that always impressed me. So, as much as I like Kellen Moore, I would tend to put the interceptions from last year on him- asking Dak to do too much.
Dak's issue is his inability to be the reason that the Cowboys win against teams when the pressure is on; his tendency to choke rather than step up when things aren't going well.
The Cowboys and the Bengals were the two best teams in the NFL last year, and those two teams should have been in the Super Bowl. Yet Dak was terrible against the 49'ers, even though the defense had San Francisco well under control. Brock Purdy was in over his head, and not yet ready for a game against the Cowboys with that much at stake. Even if he had been, the 49'ers were not as good as Dallas if the Cowboys had a real quarterback.
The Cowboys should have easily beaten the Niners, and Philadelphia would have fallen as well if Dallas had the talent under center to match the rest of the team. The Cowboys can chalk a lost Super Bowl opportunity up to Dak. And it's not the first one.
This is how bad Dak hurts the team. He seems like a great guy, but he's never stepped up when a real quarterback would. Expect the same this season.
The Bengals were unfairly made to play on the road, despite having the best team, because of the Damar Hamlin event that cost them a win and unfairly awarded home field to the Chiefs.
Mike McCarthy will have to find away around Dak if he expects success.
Click to expand...
-----Sorry, but you lost me at The Cowboys and the Bengals were the two best teams in the NFL last year.
 
CCBoy

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,803
Reaction score
22,480
CCBoy said:
An instructor has six weeks in AIT to get a young soldier up to be able to face combat. Leaders have been around a little longer. Dak Prescott is a leader. Now, when a soldier, leader, is forged in fire...they come out steel. So will Prescott. He's a man first and a Cowboy second. He will adjust to the changed leadership above him now. I have faith in those leaders as well. Dak will be lead to becoming a top shelf leader of a very strong as well as a younger team.

Both the offense and defense this season, will keep the score on average, to winning point differentials. The team is good enough to handle momentum changes, that will again, happen every game.

With gained players and two 12 win consecutive seasons, they are in position to do just that. Both the offense and the defense.

Then, they are Dallas Cowboys! :starspin:
Click to expand...
As to having my six (backside) the nature of conflict one has to rely upon your buddy next to you. Football meets the criteria and the role of each of a team in confrontation. How good that becomes is on commitment to team and doing your own job as good as it can be. Be where you are supposed to be, when you are supposed to be, and with what you are supposed to have to do your mission...that becomes a team's role. Success stems from that.

Assuming a load secures respect.

As long as a person assumes the mental reference - of it shall be done...I'll go to war with him. In life, not all battles are won. A good Texas Ranger, when he was knocked down in the dirt...got up, dusted off, and continued mission.

If I was given a choice of which Cowboy to have MY back, it would be Roger Staubach, interceptions and all.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,929
Reaction score
19,486
leeblair said:
Dak has never thrown a lot of interceptions; that always impressed me. So, as much as I like Kellen Moore, I would tend to put the interceptions from last year on him- asking Dak to do too much.
Dak's issue is his inability to be the reason that the Cowboys win against teams when the pressure is on; his tendency to choke rather than step up when things aren't going well.
The Cowboys and the Bengals were the two best teams in the NFL last year, and those two teams should have been in the Super Bowl. Yet Dak was terrible against the 49'ers, even though the defense had San Francisco well under control. Brock Purdy was in over his head, and not yet ready for a game against the Cowboys with that much at stake. Even if he had been, the 49'ers were not as good as Dallas if the Cowboys had a real quarterback.
The Cowboys should have easily beaten the Niners, and Philadelphia would have fallen as well if Dallas had the talent under center to match the rest of the team. The Cowboys can chalk a lost Super Bowl opportunity up to Dak. And it's not the first one.
This is how bad Dak hurts the team. He seems like a great guy, but he's never stepped up when a real quarterback would. Expect the same this season.
The Bengals were unfairly made to play on the road, despite having the best team, because of the Damar Hamlin event that cost them a win and unfairly awarded home field to the Chiefs.
Mike McCarthy will have to find away around Dak if he expects success.
Click to expand...
How where the Cowboys the best team in NFC? Eagles were better in almost all statistical category including wins and their roster was deemed to be better than any NFC team.

But I get it, you have to make up stuff to make a totally irrelevant and meaningless argument.

You are obsessed. Dak lives in your head rent free. You have nothing to post except about Dak. Literally it's all you do. Before that you were obsessed with Garrett. You didn't talk about anything else but Garrett.

This unhealthy obsessive compulsive personality is concerning.

BTW do you still think Tashard Choice is as good as Emmitt Smith:lmao:
 
MountaineerCowboy

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,426
Reaction score
72,976
Momanpr100 said:
Was you right when you said we'll go 8-9, I guess if you keep saying it every year you'll eventually be right. I bet the Chargers go 8-9 before the Cowboys do
Click to expand...
This dude didn't even have an account here when we made preseason predictions last year and he's acting like he remembers lolololololol

Tell me this isn't a Marathons burner account.
 
DandyDon52

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,621
Reaction score
16,508
Techsass said:
I wonder how many interceptions Dak would have had, if Gallup was actually a viable #2 option all season. As far as SF goes, I bet if Pollard didn't go down & we had 2 starter worthy receivers we would have had a much better chance.

Problem was that CeeDee was all they had to worry about in the 2nd half.
Click to expand...
all teams have " ifs" that is part of the game they have to roll with the punches, and still find a way to win.
Cowboys cant do that.
I wonder what the ifs will be for this season when they get knocked out of playoffs.

I know one thing people will say, is that they have made playoffs 3 years in a row !! They must be good ! If only .... then insert the ifs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top