CFZ Prescott's interceptions aren't the issue

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,798
Reaction score
22,479
Oh the solution is obvious but we are going to keep kicking this can down the road.
The kick the can board is two doors down where they are laughing and having a party...look for the place with a lot of laughter, if you are serious.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,621
Reaction score
16,508
Of course not. NOTHING separates Dallas from being a good team...a team good enough to win a wild card game and double digit wins.

The OP stated however that we were the best team in the NFL (except for the QB)....along with the Bengals

Stating we are good enough to win double digit games and make it to a divisional round game is one thing (we are there)....stating we're the best team in the NFL (with the minor detail of not having an elite QB) is quite different.
yeah he should have said they "could be" the best team in the NFL with another better qb.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,359
Reaction score
23,779
No, the evaluations through the entire NFL, and the media as well, is supportive in the amount of really good talent that is on recent and also the present roster. More meets the eye to all as to current strength on this team, than a disappointed fan's stereotypes of blame.
None of that matters. The results are on the field. We saw the results from last season. Move on now
 

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
3,158
Dak has never thrown a lot of interceptions; that always impressed me. So, as much as I like Kellen Moore, I would tend to put the interceptions from last year on him- asking Dak to do too much.
Dak's issue is his inability to be the reason that the Cowboys win against teams when the pressure is on; his tendency to choke rather than step up when things aren't going well.
The Cowboys and the Bengals were the two best teams in the NFL last year, and those two teams should have been in the Super Bowl. Yet Dak was terrible against the 49'ers, even though the defense had San Francisco well under control. Brock Purdy was in over his head, and not yet ready for a game against the Cowboys with that much at stake. Even if he had been, the 49'ers were not as good as Dallas if the Cowboys had a real quarterback.
The Cowboys should have easily beaten the Niners, and Philadelphia would have fallen as well if Dallas had the talent under center to match the rest of the team. The Cowboys can chalk a lost Super Bowl opportunity up to Dak. And it's not the first one.
This is how bad Dak hurts the team. He seems like a great guy, but he's never stepped up when a real quarterback would. Expect the same this season.
The Bengals were unfairly made to play on the road, despite having the best team, because of the Damar Hamlin event that cost them a win and unfairly awarded home field to the Chiefs.
Mike McCarthy will have to find away around Dak if he expects success.
Moore was asking Dakota "WENTZ" Prescot to do his job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

TheMightyVanHalen

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
3,124
Move on from Dak. Rush proved he was better.
If you're not satisfied with Rush, you can't legitimately be happy with Dak.
If you are not satisfied with Rush, find someone else. Rush was better than Dak.
OGC.00e4b0273680ea333362b7d66961dba9


Rush got blown out by Philthy and was the main reason we got blown out. Dak beat them and he was the main reason we did.

Rush 18-38-181 yards 1 TD 3 INTs 37,3 passer rating. All turnovers led to points.
Dak 27-35-347 3 TDs 1 INT 124.3 passer rating



The clowns prior to the 2022 season said Dak needs trust his arm more because he wasn't throwing in tight windows since our receivers are not getting separation, are the same clowns that are saying Dak is forcing the ball. Dak could win the SB and those clowns will say "It's about time!" instead of giving him his props.
 

Cowboys5217

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,325
Reaction score
11,582
Dak has never thrown a lot of interceptions; that always impressed me. So, as much as I like Kellen Moore, I would tend to put the interceptions from last year on him- asking Dak to do too much.
Dak's issue is his inability to be the reason that the Cowboys win against teams when the pressure is on; his tendency to choke rather than step up when things aren't going well.
The Cowboys and the Bengals were the two best teams in the NFL last year, and those two teams should have been in the Super Bowl. Yet Dak was terrible against the 49'ers, even though the defense had San Francisco well under control. Brock Purdy was in over his head, and not yet ready for a game against the Cowboys with that much at stake. Even if he had been, the 49'ers were not as good as Dallas if the Cowboys had a real quarterback.
The Cowboys should have easily beaten the Niners, and Philadelphia would have fallen as well if Dallas had the talent under center to match the rest of the team. The Cowboys can chalk a lost Super Bowl opportunity up to Dak. And it's not the first one.
This is how bad Dak hurts the team. He seems like a great guy, but he's never stepped up when a real quarterback would. Expect the same this season.
The Bengals were unfairly made to play on the road, despite having the best team, because of the Damar Hamlin event that cost them a win and unfairly awarded home field to the Chiefs.
Mike McCarthy will have to find away around Dak if he expects success.
If Aaron Rodgers was our starter last year I think we make it to the SB and have a good chance against KC.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,798
Reaction score
22,479
None of that matters. The results are on the field. We saw the results from last season. Move on now
Go ahead and bet your stance and see how long the money stays yours!
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,426
Reaction score
72,973
Compared to people like you who root against our team so y'all can right?

Not only are you not a fan of our team but you're a sophomaniac too.
Hey.

This is the first I heard from you until you told me to take that losing bet last year in the playoffs that you was 100% sure of lolololololol

You lost your credibility, bro.
 

TheMightyVanHalen

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
3,124
Hey.

This is the first I heard from you until you told me to take that losing bet last year in the playoffs that you was 100% sure of lolololololol

You lost your credibility, bro.
Wow, slick deflection. You should be politician.

Can you show me what you're crowing about? I don't post very much so it shouldn't be hard to find.
 

DCwarrior

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,490
Reaction score
1,597
Ever seen the numbers of interceptions thrown by Roger Staubach...consistently?

Teams have to overcome momentum changers that come in every single game played. :facepalm: :muttley::thumbdown:

It takes a whole team to over come most playoff negative plays...that includes receivers and offensive linemen, as well as your starting running back.
Less interceptions is less negative plays to overcome for everyone you mentioned. The picks are a problem whether you want to accept it or not.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,798
Reaction score
22,479
Less interceptions is less negative plays to overcome for everyone you mentioned. The picks are a problem whether you want to accept it or not.
Does that apply then to Roger Staubach as well?
 
Top