G2
Taco Engineer
- Messages
- 25,340
- Reaction score
- 26,869
Easy. Owens and Witten were HOF caliber, reliable players. They always created separation, got open and had great hands. Not sure what you saw but they made some great catches and in their prime made some great after the catch. Owens was elite everywhere he played. Witten played forever. Bryant made some great grabs in his prime, those weren't all perfectly placed passes. I get your point about a couple of mediocre WR's that bombed when they went elsewhere, but you can literally say that about many WRs on other teams.Owens maybe. But how could you say that about either of the other two?
Bryant ran horrible routes, and the back shoulder throw was his best friend, because Romo could put it exactly where it needed to be.
Witten, while I love the guy, didn't exactly make spectacular grabs. He got open momentarily, which is what he was supposed to do...and Romo knew when to throw him the ball to take advantage of that. I haven't seen anything like that from Dak....yet.
It's reasonable to assume id Prescott had an Owens, Witten or Bryant in their prime perhaps he'd have some bigger numbers.
I really don't understand the Romo fascination. He was very good in the regular season. I wish the same excuses fans still use for Romo were afforded to Prescott. That and it's unrealistic at best to compare 12 years to 2 and a half. Even Romo said he wasn't a very accurate or strong passer in his early years and that he developed.
Maybe Prescott won't get any better. Who knows. But the biased around here is crazy. Fans are STILL drooling over Romo.