No, it's not totally fair.I think that's totally fair...he's got a fairly wide range from 5 ish to 15ish ...but I'd say he's at least above average.
I'd put him closer to 10 with upside but I think the people saying he's terrible or not an NFL starter are very off base
Herbert really made a difference for the Jags I give you thatNot to mention that there are new QBs entering the league every year so top ten to start the year doesn’t mean you won’t just drop out of that by the end of the season. Also yes, the top 4 guys lead the pack as QBs that are difference makers and after that it’s a massive drop off
You think the Campo years was fun, your opinion is not valid.Rankings mean nothing.
The QB position in the NFL is the worst it's been in my lifetime. It's embarrassing.
Wow, such cerebral prowess. LolYou think the Campo years was fun, your opinion is not valid.
Herbert does not ply for the Jags. He plays for the Chargers. Think you mean LawrenceHerbert really made a difference for the Jags I give you that
No it just went over your head. 3 points in the second half, after a 27 point lead. Yea he was the difference maker for the Jags.Herbert does not ply for the Jags. He plays for the Chargers. Think you mean Lawrence
Well the inverse is also true because Lawrence was the Chargers best player too lol.No it just went over your head. 3 points in the second half, after a 27 point lead. Yea he was the difference maker for the Jags.
Yea for sure. Just responding to the false narrativesWell the inverse is also true because Lawrence was the Chargers best player too lol.
I think the Chargers had 17 points on less than 40 yards of offense in the first half after turnovers.
That's definitely my perception, also. But it might just be perception.Rankings mean nothing.
The QB position in the NFL is the worst it's been in my lifetime. It's embarrassing.
Yep...only way to change that narrative is to make it to AT LEAST the NFCCGWherever Cousins gets ranked Dak goes right next to
Nonsense. This is the best way to tell people who don't know what they're talking about.Wherever Cousins gets ranked Dak goes right next to
Nonsense. This is the best way to tell people who don't know what they're talking about.
Dak is demonstrably superior to Cousins in every way.
It’s funny y’all think this because it’s some 90s statues that wouldn’t survive in todays game.That's definitely my perception, also. But it might just be perception.
One of my theories: League rules make it easier on the QB position to the point where a lot of average guys can have some success, but usually not sustained success. So QB evaluation is all over the place.
This is beneficial for team building, because you could feasibly have a guy on year 3 of a rookie deal take you to the super bowl-- creating a nice little window for a loaded roster.
Yet the old mindset of chaining the team to a "Franchise QB" persists in most FOs, and usually a team will reward a QB because of some success, that again, are a product a QB friendly league.
Therefore, there are outsized expectations on guys who basically amount to this decade's Mark Brunell. Solid QBs, but not someone that any 90s franchise would have attached themselves to.
Stafford and Rogers should be higher. Both are better technical QBs and both have won a Super Bowl.
They can be taken seriously because the results speak for themselves. Dak shrivels up when the prospect of winning in the divisional round shows up just like Romo.Anyone saying Dak is not top 10 cannot be taken seriously.
No QB has led a higher scoring average per start over the last 3 seasons.
And the guy in 2nd is Mahomes.