I can also cherry pick certain stats too. Talk about lazy ways of looking at stuff. Beyond silly approach without looking at the bigger picture.
Comparing them since 2016. Yes dak was a rookie and learning so not exactly the best comparison but...
Dak has had a vastly superior supporting cast around him his entire career . Vikings OL was complete trash from 2018-2021 ranking in the mid to low 20s. 2017 ranked 14th and last year was either 18 or 19 I believe(which still sucks). Dak also benifits from a superior run game bar the 2020 season.
Cousins has better comp %, td %, and better qbr. Y/A and AY/A the same along with a couple other stats. Dak is superior in less turnover and turnerver %.
Playoffs Cousins has better QBR and Comp%
This all playing behind a vastly inferior OL. Trust me I hate arguing the "stats" approach and don't think either quarterback is going to lead their team to a superbowl on their shoulders.
I too can find memes or twitter posts suggesting certain cherry picked stats that show he's superior to even mahomes.
These are the lazy stats I'm talking about and aren't all even correct. Big picture is that Cousins has been in the league forever and actually done LESS than Dak.
Completion % is not a valid QB stat because it doesn't account for drops or separation, especially in comparison to turnover-worthy plays. It's a team stat and totally irrelevant.
Td% is scheme dependent and totally irrelevant (the difference in their career is .1% anyway).
QBR: Dak - 65.7 Kirk - 57.2
The idea that Dak has had superior teams is laughably dumb. He's never had talent like Diggs/Theilen and the Dallas OL being good is a total, complete myth since 2018.
I didn't post memes, they're just easier to share from Twitter. Those are data that account for when the game is difficult - third down and under pressure. If all other things are equal, that is the largest differentiator.
Just a totally stupid argument.