Twitter: Proof of who carries the Cowboys team

USArmyVet said:
Have you ever served in the military? Have you ever read where I insulted a veteran? Learn some respect as there are lines you do not cross but clearly your blind bias for Dak allows you to have no morals when it comes to veterans.

There are many I may disagree with on here such as Rockport and words are said but never once have I ever insulted a veteran by calling out their service because at the end of the day this is nothing but a fan forum but there is still a level of respect for those fellow veterans that served.
Click to expand...
Yes, I served, plus got disabled afterwards putting my life in the line of duty. I respect anyone and everyone, regardless of service or not. You disappoint me though when you start the personal attacks when one defends our QB. I expect better from a fellow veteran. That's all.
 
OmerV said:
It doesn't mean much, but the decision the team has to make is if Dak is a reason there aren't enough playoff wins, or if he is a building block to help accomplish more playoff wins in the future.
Click to expand...
Does a $40M QB make sense for this team right now? Seems like there are a lot of voids to fill, one of them quite possibly being the HC.
 
nightrain said:
Draft picks have been lean of late, but I don't see much difference between 6-10 and 8-8 with no playoffs. I don't think Dak is the problem, buts let's not pretend they can't win without him because they haven't won anything with him either.
Click to expand...

I mean with the schedule they drew they were going to be a 10 win team easily before Dak went down. The defense was terrible (though it got better once they cut the dead weight) but I can easily pinpoint 4-5 games that are wins if they had the QB who was putting up historically good numbers versus a QB who dragged down the Bengals for the better part of a decade.
 
America's Cowboy said:
Yes, I served, plus got disabled afterwards putting my life in the line of duty. I respect anyone and everyone, regardless of service or not. You disappoint me though when you start the personal attacks when one defends our QB. I expect better from a fellow veteran. That's all.
Click to expand...

Things get heated and people saty things so while we disagree on Dak, I respect your service and am sorry to hear of your disability. So, let's keep that respect in place, fair enough?
 
Adreme said:
I mean with the schedule they drew they were going to be a 10 win team easily before Dak went down. The defense was terrible (though it got better once they cut the dead weight) but I can easily pinpoint 4-5 games that are wins if they had the QB who was putting up historically good numbers versus a QB who dragged down the Bengals for the better part of a decade.
Click to expand...
Yea, but that same QB was 1-3 going into the game he was injured. He should have been 0-4 if not for a ridiculous bed wetting by Atlanta. That's not all on Dak, but he was the QB.
 
Rockport said:
You’re not making any sense. But Dak haters rarely ever do.
Click to expand...
You dont understand that I was merely replying to your post about FF stats?
I was only intending to point you in a more proper direction if you prefer to consider FF stats.
If so use FF stats from leagues that utilize a cap.
Not every response is an attack,, there is plenty to learn if you open your mind sometimes.
I get called out plenty for my views in this house, but I try and keep an open perspective and I want to learn from others here with differing opinions.
Change your name to old mean Pitbull ... lol
 
The facts are that as the season went on our OL was down to third stringers including UDFA rookies.
 
nightrain said:
Does a $40M QB make sense for this team right now? Seems like there are a lot of voids to fill, one of them quite possibly being the HC.
Click to expand...
That's a decision the team has to make on Dak. The head coach really isn't relevant though - they have to make a decision on Dak regardless of the head coach.

Given how the team seems to like to build through the draft, I think there is a pretty decent chance they feel they can use draft picks to fill needs and still keep Dak. Some of those key draft picks would likely be lost on a new QB if Dak were gone.
 
OmerV said:
That's a decision the team has to make on Dak. The head coach really isn't relevant though - they have to make a decision on Dak regardless of the head coach.

Given how the team seems to like to build through the draft, I think there is a pretty decent chance they feel they can use draft picks to fill needs and still keep Dak. Some of those key draft picks would likely be lost on a new QB if Dak were gone.
Click to expand...
I think if they can hit on 2 good players for the middle of that D, Dak makes sense. The offense as we saw can be explosive if they protect the ball, but not many QBs in the game today can salvage a team with the trash we saw in 2020 on the defensive side of the ball.
 
until some one carry them to a super bowl i dont care who is doing the heavy lifting for a 8 win team
 
How does this fantasy stuff work? How far did we get in the fantasy playoffs? Did we get to the fantasy championship game!?
 
We all know Dak is better than his backups. Duh? But Dak can't win one without a defense, so why waste the money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 71 more.
Total: 6,813 (members: 171, guests: 6,642)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,644
Messages
13,824,048
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top