NFCBeasts
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,464
- Reaction score
- 1,784
We should all settle for mediocrity like you ….I need to buy a tissue stock because of the cry babies.
We should all settle for mediocrity like you ….I need to buy a tissue stock because of the cry babies.
Yes, I forgot that. Yes I do believe Tad is a problem as well.I am 50/50 it’s his brother ….
The Eagles did a lot more with their team than just replace the starting quarterback. Nick Foles helped the Eagles win a Super Bowl. He played for 6 different teams. Overall team construction and coaching matters.Eagles paid Wentz. Realized it was a mistake. Drafted hurts. And won a SB.
This is all while Dallas can’t get out of the divisional round. The last decade this has happened.
SBs for Philly. 2. Appearances. 3.
Do I need to do Dallas?
2024- 44,624,800No it does not. It only works to the outcome you want it to be. And we know what that agenda is.
Agree.Wow, that's embarrassing.
Ironically, they did two things we need to do.The Eagles did a lot more with their team than just replace the starting quarterback. Nick Foles helped the Eagles win a Super Bowl. He played for 6 different teams. Overall team construction and coaching matters.
Whatever. You and others hatred for Dak makes any argument you guys make sound silly. I root for any QB for the boys to succeed. It is infantile name calling someone a "Dak Bot". I am a fan of the team.the dak bots are funny
If that happens they can come here and express their disdain. Misery loves company.And if Purdy doesn't pan out I bet the niners admit the mistake and move on. While the Cowboys will throw away a decade or more with Mr Oopsie
no, you are a fan of Dak before the teamWhatever. You and others hatred for Dak makes any argument you guys make sound silly. I root for any QB for the boys to succeed. It is infantile name calling someone a "Dak Bot". I am a fan of the team.
I am asking what players could we not sign because of his contract. If there is a player they really wanted, they could clear cap room to get. I can care less about the difference in the contracts. Yes $7 million could go to a FA or toward Micah, or whatever.Okay so I followed the convo and replied it to show that I never once said it was Dak’s fault. You said that I need to prove something is Dak’s fault and I still have no clue what you’re talking about.
The salary cap is a team resource. That’s a fact. Purdy averages 53 million APY and Dak averages 60 Million APY. Those are facts. Every team has the same salary cap. So 60 is higher than 53. Therefore Dak is taking up more resources than Purdy. Are you asking me to prove what fault Dak has with his contract. I can prove that Dak demanded:
4 years 240 million contract, 60 million APY
NTC
231 guaranteed money
Dak had to ask for that. He knew what he was asking for and therefore it’s his “fault” he demanded an extremely unfriendly team contract. How did Dak get everything he wanted unless he demanded it.
What I was saying you can't say Purdy is actually $45 million per year, because he is getting only $5 million this year. Come next year, it will be $53 million.2024- 44,624,800
2025- 50,518,430
2026- 74,068,430
2027- 68,385,783
2028- 78,385,783 Then add in the 9,150,000 they stuck on to void.
I then opened up calculator on my desktop and added them all up. It came out to 325,133,226. I then divided by 5. It averages out to 65,026,645 per year. But you don't have to believe those numbers.
How would fans ever know? They were not signed. The concern is the same person that thought it was a good idea to sign Dak Prescott to an unprecedented contract is involved in every decision regarding building the Cowboys’ roster. The salary cap in the NFL means owners can’t just throw money at players and expect to win a Super Bowl.I am asking what players could we not sign because of his contract. If there is a player they really wanted, they could clear cap room to get. I can care less about the difference in the contracts. Yes $7 million could go to a FA or toward Micah, or whatever.
It is just the FO deciding if they want that or not.
It is not Dak preventing them form not signing players.
However, fans will have varying opinions. And I am not defending Dak nor the FO. That is just how I see it.
And I am not a big Dak fan either. I preferred they let him play out his contract and possibly they could have moved on.
Oh bs.We should all settle for mediocrity like you ….
I'm not trying to say something is good or bad, or trying to blame anyone. Just giving the raw numbers going forward. Of course it's much easier with Purdy.What I was saying you can't say Purdy is actually $45 million per year, because he is getting only $5 million this year. Come next year, it will be $53 million.
Dak's new deal does not include a rookie contract to offset the average as much as Purdy's.
Yeah, can’t find it. Do you have a link? I want to see the context of the conversation.He said that at a press conference in training camp last year. You can’t give another try YouTubeing it. But yes it was a post practice press conference and they started asking about his contract and he said he owed it to the QB brotherhood and all the QBs behind him to set the market high.
I recall the comment. I suspect that kind of thinking is prevalent among NFL players. Definitely not unique to Dak.Yeah, can’t find it. Do you have a link? I want to see the context of the conversation.
truth hurts doesn;t it? you would be happily singing as the titanic sank because you never could see the water comingOh bs.
It was talked about here a fair amount. Anyone claiming it did not happen is flat our lying.I recall the comment. I suspect that kind of thinking is prevalent among NFL players. Definitely not unique to Dak.
For your education, I have bashed Dak or any other player when they play bad. I don't have a myopic hatred for one player. I was never on board resiging Dak. But I don't whine about him on every thread.no, you are a fan of Dak before the team
so that makes you a Dak Bot