QB Brad Johnson is probably our new Holder

philo beddoe;1439918 said:
LOL. What act? Johnson was a SB QB 5 years or more ago, the man is 39 years old. His skills are diminished, he's OLD. Why not sign Jeff George, at least he can still pass. Just hope Johnson as backup doesn't come back to haunt us!:eek:

This is a stupid comment, Johnson can still pass as well hitting 61% of his passes. Cowboys are not interested about the age factor for a backup, he is not going to play 16 games but if we need a guy to come in for a few weeks Johnson is more than capable of doing it.
 
Doomsday101;1439778 said:
What gets me is they rag on Johnson and praise guys who have not done a damn thing. The whole Ricky (I can't make an NFL team) Ray and in the meantime Dallas has a QB in Johnson who helped get his team to the SB and win it as well as proving himself time and again. Dallas is not looking to groom some guy as a backup they want a guy who has been there before and that is what Johnson brings.
RR is a full twelve years youger than Johnson. All Ray needs is a legit opportunity, the rest will take care of itself.
 
Hostile;1439914 said:
I have been. It's like talking to a wall.

LOL. And of course you are always willing to compromise your views. Right?

Talk about talking to a wall...geez. :banghead:

Perhaps we are just too much alike my friend. :lmao2:

Make it a great day.
 
TheProphet;1439906 said:
You didn't answer MY question PUNK. Cite where I lied about my service? You'll have to ask Philo why he entered an incorrect DOB. Innocent mistake perhaps? Modesty? Or it could it be that many folks chose not to reveal too much personal info on an internet discussion board? Pick one. You really are pathetic.

Here's the exchange

Bob Sacamano;1417431 said:
didn't you guys just meet on here not too long ago?

philo beddoe;1417435 said:
Heavens no, we've been compadres since back in the late 60's in the Nam.

First lie.

philo beddoe;1417497 said:
Is that right? And you know this how? I'm a vet, buddy, don't you forget it. I have nothing to prove to you.

superpunk;1417502 said:
philo's birth date

1958

American involvement in Vietnam ends in 1975.

Late 60s minus 1958 = at most 11 years old.

1975 - 1958 = at most 17/18 years old

philo beddoe;1417507 said:
I did I put 1958? Typo, brother. It's 1954. Sorry.

Second lie.

superpunk;1417515 said:
So, when you and TheProphet met in Nam, to quote you "in the late 60s", you weren't 11, you were 15.

I am not a veteran, but I find your little game disgusting.

Or do you have another "correction" to your birthdate. Maybe you meant 1948?

philo beddoe;1417520 said:
Got a tad confused, bro. We actually met in the late 60's at a Boy Scout Jamboree. We later met up over in SE Asia in the early 70's. Sorry for all the confusion. I get a little too far into the ales sometimes. LOL. We're all straight now.

Third lie, which contradicts his first lie.

TheProphet;1417528 said:
Bowman got a little caught on on the going ons of the era, if you know what I mean. Direct your questions to me on this topic going forward. I got through the late 60's - mid 70's with minimal damage. My brother Bowman cannot say the same.

And you never even think to correct him. Although, it is clear you have a (minimally) superior intellect, as you took the lead (clearly you are the "man" in this relationship) in asking for all questions to be directed to you on this topic in the future -as clearly Bowman's brain is not sufficient to keep this fabrication in proper order.

Also funny is that in this post you pardon philo, suggesting his involvement with drugs - yet part of you and philo's schtick is nonstop Quincy Carter bashing for his drug involvement.

superpunk;1417541 said:
Was this before or after Nixon announced he was withdrawing 200,000 troops in 1969? (when you were 15) Before or after he withdrew a horde (70,000) of troops in 1972? (you were 17) Before or after January 1973, when the Paris Peace agreement was signed? (when you had been 18 for 6 months)?

We're on your third lie now. You should quit.

Liars and hypocrites?

:eek:

This is LARGE, brother.
 
WoodysGirl;1439926 said:
Exactly. So don't complain about abuse and get caught up in the madness if you can simply avoid it by putting a person on ignore.

Point well taken Woody. Thanks
 
Doomsday101;1439929 said:
This is a stupid comment, Johnson can still pass as well hitting 61% of his passes. Cowboys are not interested about the age factor for a backup, he is not going to play 16 games but if we need a guy to come in for a few weeks Johnson is more than capable of doing it.
Johnson can still throw the old dink and dunk, that's about it. The sideline throws are pathetic, and his long ball needs a punt hang time clock. LOL. Get serious.:)
 
Doomsday101;1439929 said:
This is a stupid comment, Johnson can still pass as well hitting 61% of his passes. Cowboys are not interested about the age factor for a backup, he is not going to play 16 games but if we need a guy to come in for a few weeks Johnson is more than capable of doing it.
ONE MORE TIME: What if it's for more than JUST A FEW WEEKS???????????????:rolleyes:
 
superpunk;1439932 said:
Here's the exchange





First lie.







Second lie.





Third lie, which contradicts his first lie.



And you never even think to correct him. Although, it is clear you have a (minimally) superior intellect, as you took the lead (clearly you are the "man" in this relationship) in asking for all questions to be directed to you on this topic in the future -as clearly Bowman's brain is not sufficient to keep this fabrication in proper order.

Also funny is that in this post you pardon philo, suggesting his involvement with drugs - yet part of you and philo's schtick is nonstop Quincy Carter bashing for his drug involvement.



Liars and hypocrites?

:eek:

This is LARGE, brother.
I never lie, brother. Knock it off, you're walking on the fighting side of me.:(
 
superpunk;1439932 said:
Here's the exchange





First lie.







Second lie.





Third lie, which contradicts his first lie.



And you never even think to correct him. Although, it is clear you have a (minimally) superior intellect, as you took the lead (clearly you are the "man" in this relationship) in asking for all questions to be directed to you on this topic in the future -as clearly Bowman's brain is not sufficient to keep this fabrication in proper order.

Also funny is that in this post you pardon philo, suggesting his involvement with drugs - yet part of you and philo's schtick is nonstop Quincy Carter bashing for his drug involvement.



Liars and hypocrites?

:eek:

This is LARGE, brother.

I think, if anything, you proved my point Punkster. This exchange you have so painlessly copied and pasted proves nothing more than Philo had the incorrect DOB thing entered. Hardly proves he did not serve his country.
How about posting a factoid about your background so I can pick it part as well? Like I said you are truly pathetic or extremely naive if you are so quick to rush to judgment. Probably a combination of both.
 
TheProphet;1439931 said:
LOL. And of course you are always willing to compromise your views. Right?

Talk about talking to a wall...geez. :banghead:

Perhaps we are just too much alike my friend. :lmao2:

Make it a great day.
When have I asked you to "compromise your views." You are right about one thing in this, I will not budge when I am right, and dude, I am right.

The proof is in the pudding. You guys do the same tired act over and over and over again and we have to clean up the mess. I explain to you why you're catching grief and you do NOTHING to change.

Every time you whine about this crap when you repeat the same things I have told you 5 times cause the reactions I will care less and less and less. Do not lie and say I haven't tried to help both of you through this. I have. I'm past the point of trying and fed up. Period.
 
TheProphet;1439946 said:
I think, if anything, you proved my point Punkster. This exchange you have so painlessly copied and pasted proves nothing more than Philo had the incorrect DOB thing entered. Hardly proves he did not serve his country.

If you think that's all it proves, you either cannot read, or cannot think.

My money's on both.
 
Hostile;1439949 said:
When have I asked you to "compromise your views." You are right about one thing in this, I will not budge when I am right, and dude, I am right.

The proof is in the pudding. You guys do the same tired act over and over and over again and we have to clean up the mess. I explain to you why you're catching grief and you do NOTHING to change.

Every time you whine about this crap when you repeat the same things I have told you 5 times cause the reactions I will care less and less and less. Do not lie and say I haven't tried to help both of you through this. I have. I'm past the point of trying and fed up. Period.
Sorry, but you are wrong about me.
 
philo beddoe;1439940 said:
ONE MORE TIME: What if it's for more than JUST A FEW WEEKS???????????????:rolleyes:

Johnson is still very capable and more so than many of the loser QB's you have thrown out there as backups.
 
Doomsday101;1439953 said:
Johnson is still very capable and more so than many of the loser QB's you have thrown out there as backups.
Think so do you? LOL. Johnson is old and done.:eek:
 
(Yes I skipped to the end of thread... and its a good thing too cuz I missed all the argument)

Put me down for wanting Patrick Crayton to hold. He's got great hands and athleticism to potentially make something happen on a failed snap.

Jay Novacek held for FG's in the early 90's... and had at least 1 very nice fake FG run. With Brad Johnson holding there is NO potential for a fake FG... with Crayton holding, the defense has to be aware that we have a good athlete holding and on their toes for a fake rather than just going ALL out to block the FG.
 
superpunk;1439951 said:
If you think that's all it proves, you either cannot read, or cannot think.

My money's on both.

Believe what you will guy. I'm done attempting to defend myself to your slander. Now run along and hide behind the skirts "others" on this board. LOL. Tough guy detective.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,277
Messages
13,862,933
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top