QB change?

[JMead]

in 5 and 1/2 games Bledsoe turned the ball over 9 times.
in 10 and 1/2 games Romo turned the ball over 16 times.

you do the math

I think you proved my point for me.

If Bledsoe is a turnover machine I guess that would make Romo the turnover machine part deux?

Bias , Bias , Bias.

 

[dre1614]

I think you proved my point for me.

If Bledsoe is a turnover machine I guess that would make Romo the turnover machine part deux?

Bias , Bias , Bias.

um how am i bias but your not?

both have been prone to turnovers, so why are you arguing for Bledsoe?

see my point?

 

[Cochese]

um how am i bias but your not?

both have been prone to turnovers, so why are you arguing for Bledsoe?

see my point?

He is a Deadslow fanboi, we only have to deal with them for 3 more games at the max.

 

[Thick 'N Hearty]

haha,no i just found it on google..

thank god i didnt post a shirtless parcells

Brumph!!!!! I think I threw up a little.

 

[BrassCowboy]

I could understand the skepticism if we were talking about Aikman, but we're talking about a first-year starter and a coach who might be making his final trip to the playoffs.

Admittedly, this is a worst case scenario that noone including myself wants to see, but I don't think it's as inconceivable as everyone would like to belive. It's the playoffs, the goal is the super bowl, and if Romo has 2 fumbles, 2 ints, and a 30% completion rate and we still have a chance to win the game I don't think Tuna would hesistate to go to the bullpen.

As for wounding Romo's ego, I don't think that's really concern as he seems to have a fairly healthy opinion about himself. I'm sure he would recover form a benching just fine. Drew, on the other hand, might be ruined from what happened to him earlier this season.

ah I see the tone in your writing you are a Romo hater.... LOL

Romo is the last guy I personally blame for the recent losses... actually if it weren't for Romo, we would even be sniffing playoffs let alone be in them....

Romo is the guy, and you put a better coaching staff on board (especially DC), I think we would be set and ready next year....

I do however hold out hope for this year's playoffs because only Romo can get us 30+ points consistantly, and with Zimmer on board... we will need thehigh point games

 

[Hypnotoad]

I think you proved my point for me.

If Bledsoe is a turnover machine I guess that would make Romo the turnover machine part deux?

Bias , Bias , Bias.

Everyone! Lets give bledsoe a chance, in a few more seasons he will have enough experience to stop turning over like that. Really!

 

[theogt]

Everyone! Lets give bledsoe a chance, in a few more seasons he will have enough experience to stop turning over like that. Really!

Go back and read this guy's past posts. He's been negative about Romo since the beginning. He wants to talk about biases, but isn't aware of his own -- that's the problem with biases.

 

[Hypnotoad]

haha yeah..

here's one for the ladies

LOL, i was watching beauty and the geek the other day...he reminds me of matt pictured here

Much like bledsoe, matt doesnt like to run.

All in good fun though, I really respect the guy.

 

[superpunk]

I can't stand the Bledsoe trolls.

Because Bledsoe did alot of good things here, and was the best QB we'd had in a long time. He had a hell of a hard road to hoe last year, persevered, showed a ton of grit, and had a respectable season. But these yahoos irritate everyone so much that they're forced to only focus on his flaws. Just ignore them, people.

 

[Munchis]

haha yeah..

here's one for the ladies

Can you please send me the link to where you found this?

Munchis.....Out!!!

 

[KingTuna]

But if Romo goes down for any reason, I'll become the biggest Bledsoe supporter this board has ever seen.:starspin

I will hold you to that!

 

[rynochop]

I brought this topic up on the DC.com forum.

It was locked out after like 3 posts cause they thought it was a troll post

It's not just like its totally out of the realm of possibilities that Romo could struggle in the first half.

What if we're down 17-3 at the half with a Romo pic and a fumble, and the defense has played well? Anyone think there's zero chance Parcells and his legacy won't make a change?

That said, Go Romo!

 

[theogt]

I brought this topic up on the DC.com forum.

It was locked out after like 3 posts cause they thought it was a troll post

It's not just like its totally out of the realm of possibilities that Romo could struggle in the first half.

What if we're down 17-3 at the half with a Romo pic and a fumble, and the defense has played well? Anyone think there's zero chance Parcells and his legacy won't make a change?

That said, Go Romo!

Actually it is out of the realm of possibility that Bledsoe would come in even if Romo performs poorly in the first half. That you can't see this means that you're either (1) really really stupid, or (2) a troll.

 

[rynochop]

Actually it is out of the realm of possibility that Bledsoe would come in even if Romo performs poorly in the first half. That you can't see this means that you're either (1) really really stupid, or (2) a troll.

hmm...lets see my join date April 04, yours Dec 05.

ok there, buddy...you've sold me.

 

[Cochese]

hmm...lets see my join date April 04, yours Dec 05.

ok there, buddy...you've sold me.

Idiots join the forum every day of the year. Whats your point?

 

[theogt]

hmm...lets see my join date April 04, yours Dec 05.

ok there, buddy...you've sold me.

Thanks for settling the speculation over which one applies to you.

 

[rynochop]

Thanks for settling the speculation over which one applies to you.

over 6700 posts...i'm sure all as compelling as these last two.