QB pressures, their impact on passer rating and FAs

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901

There's several of these high pressure guys expected to be available in FA ranging from expensive to fairly cheap. Hopefully they can bring in 1 or 2 of these guys. Ingram or JPP could be more long term, but guys like Long, Johnson or Alexander could help as stop gaps on reasonable deals. It's not just about sacks, though they are nice. Some of these guys below would seem to be nice additions that I never would have thought about. Some of these guys I wanted before, but want more now, like Ingram. I'm actually more open to JPP after seeing his pressures as well as his sack numbers in the number of games he played.

Melvin Ingram 8th with 29
Chris Long 11th with 27
JPP 14th with 24
Sheard 23rd with 21
Chandler Jones 24th with 21
Charles Johnson 36th with 19
Lorenzo Alexander 45th with 17
Nick Perry 49th with 17
Addison 59th with 15

Numbers pulled from
https://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/defensive-hurries/2016/
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903

There's several of these high pressure guys expected to be available in FA ranging from expensive to fairly cheap. Hopefully they can bring in 1 or 2 of these guys. Ingram or JPP could be more long term, but guys like Long, Johnson or Alexander could help as stop gaps on reasonable deals. It's not just about sacks, though they are nice. Some of these guys below would seem to be nice additions that I never would have thought about. Some of these guys I wanted before, but want more now, like Ingram. I'm actually more open to JPP after seeing his pressures as well as his sack numbers in the number of games he played.

Melvin Ingram 8th with 29
Chris Long 11th with 27
JPP 14th with 24
Sheard 23rd with 21
Chandler Jones 24th with 21
Charles Johnson 36th with 19
Lorenzo Alexander 45th with 17
Nick Perry 49th with 17
Addison 59th with 15

Numbers pulled from
https://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/defensive-hurries/2016/

Thanks for the post bro!
JPP isn't bad when you look at pressures and sacks and factor in his missed 4 games. There are some others that look promising as well. War daddy time!
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Nice post.

Pressure and at times containment is priority #1. Sacks are secondary and come as a result with pressure although some rushers will have higher sack totals/pressures than others.
 

GhostOfPelluer

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,389
Reaction score
5,309
Did everyone see Tyrone Crawford is 16th? Underated by the board, or are the stats useless?
They're not useless. They only tell part of the story, but they do tell part of the story. Great production for his $1.25 million salary and solid production for his $4.35 million cap hit. If he doesn't take his game to another level in 2017 then he becomes overpaid.
 

Setackin

radioactivecowboy88
Messages
3,858
Reaction score
4,612
I'm warming to the idea of Ingram or JPP, but I don't think the addition of either should change the draft strategy. DL and CB should be the high priorities.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,723
Reaction score
95,224
I believe it's been stated that Sporting Charts is notoriously inaccurate with stats like this.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
They're not useless. They only tell part of the story, but they do tell part of the story. Great production for his $1.25 million salary and solid production for his $4.35 million cap hit. If he doesn't take his game to another level in 2017 then he becomes overpaid.
To be fair, TCrawford's salary was 6.75m this year.......5.5m was restructured into a signing bonus but it still counts

But you are right about the cap hit and the need to judge him from this point forward as a large cap hit player
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
Who was that DE from Purdue that was on the team with Greg Ellis? He was the "almost sack master". LOL
 

irishline

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
4,214
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Who was that DE from Purdue that was on the team with Greg Ellis? He was the "almost sack master". LOL

Anthony Spencer. But he was really with Ware not Ellis (they were only on the roster together two seasons).
 

GhostOfPelluer

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,389
Reaction score
5,309
To be fair, TCrawford's salary was 6.75m this year.......5.5m was restructured into a signing bonus but it still counts

But you are right about the cap hit and the need to judge him from this point forward as a large cap hit player
People are gonna crap if they do the same thing this year, which would make it almost impossible to cut him in 2018.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
To be fair to our defense, when they started pressing QBs agian we got away from it.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
Did everyone see Tyrone Crawford is 16th? Underated by the board, or are the stats useless?
From mostly the DE position which he manned most of the time. It also happens to be a position he is not equipped for in teh NFL even though he played it in college. He got his current contract flashing as very good 3T but last season played mostly DE because he could contain the edge better than anyone else that played DE, but he has no burst from the DE spot hence why he was moved inside 2 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
People are gonna crap if they do the same thing this year, which would make it almost impossible to cut him in 2018.
that is the biggest fallacy going........ the dead money should have no bearing on the decision to cut a player......it is only about being worth his salary any more

His base salary of 7.25m guarantees on 3/13....... at that point they should restructure him.......all guaranteed contracts should be restructured and should be done before any non-gtd salaries
 

GhostOfPelluer

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,389
Reaction score
5,309
that is the biggest fallacy going........ the dead money should have no bearing on the decision to cut a player......it is only about being worth his salary any more

His base salary of 7.25m guarantees on 3/13....... at that point they should restructure him.......all guaranteed contracts should be restructured and should be done before any non-gtd salaries
I didn't say that correctly. Not that they couldn't cut him but it would likely be cap neutral at that point so as long as he's useful they wouldn't want to
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
I didn't say that correctly. Not that they couldn't cut him but it would likely be cap neutral at that point so as long as he's useful they wouldn't want to
No you were right about this place freaking out.......but that is because the idea of dead money is still not completely understood.......DAL should always create the space when possible because they never know when they might need it..........if they don't they can always roll it over
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,645
Reaction score
31,938
"Pressures are much better than sacks"... says the loser making excuses for not getting as many sacks. :rolleyes:
 

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901
"Pressures are much better than sacks"... says the loser making excuses for not getting as many sacks. :rolleyes:
Better than the person pulling a straw man out of his ***. That hasn't been uttered in this thread anywhere. Coming from you though, it isn't surprising.
 
Top