I agree it looks bad for the coaching staff, who I won't defend at all, but...
Weeden was 11/18 for 105 yards and a touchdown. His team scored 16 points. He didn't light the world on fire.
The Texans defense won that game. Lets not get carried away.
So Weeden. leads the Texans to win today after only a few weeks in the system but neither him nor cassel can help our team to win at all?? Does that make our problem bad backup quarterbacks or bad system??
But Hasselback has won games with the Colts..
Are you people serious? Weeden is in a place where he is not in the spot light and there is no pressure there in Houston. Kellen Moore knows the offense period, because the offense is Scott Linehans mixed with Jason Garrett's and Romo's input. So Scott only needed to call plays from his part of the offense and Moore has that down pat. He did good, I believe the backup QB is no longer a priority now.
This Offense is so geared to Romo that it is hard for another QB to run it with a lot of success, Moore has something to him.
Weeden's success today does not mean our coaching staff is bad or that the texans is better/. I have heard Garrett many times thru out these past 5 yrs take blame when he needs to take the blame and sometimes when he does not. So all the people that says he does not is lying
JG's creativity is gone.
I don't feel that Weeden should be given an "attaboy" for playing Jason Garrett ball against one of the worst defensive teams in the league. The Texans sixteen points is the only time this season that a team has failed to score twenty points on the Colts.
Sixteen points here loses games.
Weeden came in at the end of the first half and the Texans has zero points. He also has been with the team for barely a month. Pull the other lever.
The answer is pretty clear but nobody wants to admit it. This system is geared so far towards Romo that it is difficult for anyone else to function in it.
It is so much easier to say Weeden is horrible and Cassel is horrible. They are but this staff did neither of them any favors.
The offense needs an elite QB to function. Kind of scary for a team that has drafted like three legit QBs in the last 25 years.
And? 16 points against the Colts is still 16 points against the Colts. Weeden was terrible with the Browns and the Cowboys and now people are supposed to be impressed with him putting up sixteen points. I'm sorry dude, but that bar being set is just embarrassingly low if that is somehow impressive.
You mean he had some?
Back when TO was here, there was some. I remember TO used to line up all over the field, in total contrast to Dez now.
Are you really this dense or are you just pretending? If he played 1 down and completed 1 pass, would you say "completing 1 pass against the Colts is terrible"? The team scored 16 points in basically one half, which is just fine. Looks like we have another crybaby who just can't deal with Weeden having even an ounce of success because it makes them look stupid for blaming all of the Cowboys problems on him. Weeden played well in a meaningful game, and it's making a bunch of losers on this board strangely angry.
Who would those 3 legit QB's be?
Even if we go back to Aikman, thats one. Does Quincy count as one of the 3? If my life depended on coming up with 3 legit QB's we have drafted in 25 years, well, I'd be dead . . . . .
Well, bear in mind that when I say "legit", I mean college players that are considered legit QB prospects at the NFL level. So, guys like Patrick Crayton who were drafted to be a WR would not be someone I would consider. They nabbed the mighty Bill Musgrave in 1991, Quincy and then Stephen McGee in 2009. Only one of them picked before the fourth round. They need to seriously consider revisiting the way they feel about quarterbacks imo.Garrett is above reproach so Im sure he doesnt feel the need to accept blame. Besides, its all part of the process and watching the tape to see what needs to get cleaned up.
They need to seriously consider revisiting the way they feel about quarterbacks imo.
You mean he had some?
