Quick look at the Brown's roster

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,894
Reaction score
112,873
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Bizwah;1474611 said:
They do have to play Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Baltimore twice. There's at least three or four losses there.
There are at least 5 loses there.
 

mmillman

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
35
Bizwah;1474611 said:
QB: Quinn, Frye, Anderson
RB: Lewis, Droughns
FB: Terrelle Smith
WR: Edwards
WR: Jurevicius
TE: Winslow
LT: Thomas
LG: Steinbach
C: Fraley/Bentley?
RG: Coleman
RT: Shaffer

LE: Roye
NT: Washington
RE: McKinley
LB: Wimbley
LB: McGinest
LB: Davis
LB: Jackson
CB: Bodden
CB: Baxter
SS: Jones
FS: Poole

Not a bad roster. They probably have enough talent to not totally suck. I think the number one pick is more likely than one later than what we gave them.

They do have to play Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Baltimore twice. There's at least three or four losses there.


QB is a huge question mark, OL has holes, RB (Lewis is done), LB so so, DB's beat up and questionable. This team looks at best 6-10 to me.
 

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
They go 8-8 at absolute best and only with cataclysmic issues for the other teams in their division.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
Wow I sure hope they stink it up in 2007! I think Dallas will try to bundle those picks to get McFadden from Arkansas on 2008!
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
Chocolate Lab;1474949 said:
You think they'll pick after #22? Huh?

And you can look at every team save maybe the Raiders and say that they have a lot of talent. It's the NFL. Even the worst teams have some good players... But it doesn't mean they can't go 4-12.

Try reading the post dude.

I said we're MORE likely to get the number one pick than we are one later than 22....
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,114
Reaction score
11,464
Sorry, I was confused because you started out saying how their roster wasn't bad.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
Chocolate Lab;1475213 said:
Sorry, I was confused because you started out saying how their roster wasn't bad.

No problem.

Their roster isn't too bad. Stranger things have happened. Just like Washington two years ago making the playoffs. The Giants, Cowboys, and Eagles were all limping through the season and an inferior Washington team made it two games into the playoffs.

Parity makes for many mediocre teams.
 
Top