- Messages
- 101,894
- Reaction score
- 112,873
There are at least 5 loses there.Bizwah;1474611 said:They do have to play Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Baltimore twice. There's at least three or four losses there.
There are at least 5 loses there.Bizwah;1474611 said:They do have to play Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Baltimore twice. There's at least three or four losses there.
Bizwah;1474611 said:QB: Quinn, Frye, Anderson
RB: Lewis, Droughns
FB: Terrelle Smith
WR: Edwards
WR: Jurevicius
TE: Winslow
LT: Thomas
LG: Steinbach
C: Fraley/Bentley?
RG: Coleman
RT: Shaffer
LE: Roye
NT: Washington
RE: McKinley
LB: Wimbley
LB: McGinest
LB: Davis
LB: Jackson
CB: Bodden
CB: Baxter
SS: Jones
FS: Poole
Not a bad roster. They probably have enough talent to not totally suck. I think the number one pick is more likely than one later than what we gave them.
They do have to play Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Baltimore twice. There's at least three or four losses there.
Chocolate Lab;1474949 said:You think they'll pick after #22? Huh?
And you can look at every team save maybe the Raiders and say that they have a lot of talent. It's the NFL. Even the worst teams have some good players... But it doesn't mean they can't go 4-12.
:laugh2:bigbadroy;1474802 said:but he's a *** SOLDIER!
Chocolate Lab;1475213 said:Sorry, I was confused because you started out saying how their roster wasn't bad.