Captain43Crash
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,388
- Reaction score
- 7,659
Of course it does!!!!! That should be the focus!!! Then a REAL stud CB like Jalen Ramsey and another DE.SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACT LIKE THIS RUN D DOESN'T NEED HELP??
Of course it does!!!!! That should be the focus!!! Then a REAL stud CB like Jalen Ramsey and another DE.SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACT LIKE THIS RUN D DOESN'T NEED HELP??
We need DT, LB, CB and possibly another SSO WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACT LIKE THIS RUN D DOESN'T NEED HELP??
Please look at who’s playing the final two gamesThe history of the NFL says Dominant defenses, with mediocre offenses, win Superbowls way more often, than teams with Dominant offenses, and mediocre to good defenses!
Having a DOMINANT D is way better than having a dominant O!!! It’s not even close!!!!!
That's great bro I get it, but it doesn't matter HOW many turnovers or extra drives the O gets if DAk PRESCOTT does not have the weapons to get it to or if he himself can't do something stupid. I'm with you make the D as dominant as possible but you CANNOT just pit a mediocre Offense out there at the same timeAgain, you don’t understand how a dominant D can make things easier for the offense.
Many mediocre offenses have won Superbowls with dominant defenses.
We are so close to a truly dominant D and many of you people don’t realize how special that would be!!!!!
“Oh no, our offense needs more weapons our defense is good enough”= many fans who have no clue what a dominant D can do for a team!!!
The better D will win.Please look at who’s playing the final two games
I agree. But I think the O has a very good chance of having an excellent O line. Steele coming back, and all the other O line pieces are their. Dak will only be asked to make a few plays and drive the bus. We have great depth and talent at TE. Let Schultz walk. Signing Gallop to a big contract was a mistake, but maybe, he will get better further from his injury. TY Hilton has the talent to be a 2nd. Drop Zek and keep Pollard or drop both of them. Many backs out there that will be able to run effectively behind this retooled O line. Davis may be part of the answer!That's great bro I get it, but it doesn't matter HOW many turnovers or extra drives the O gets if DAk PRESCOTT does not have the weapons to get it to or if he himself can't do something stupid. I'm with you make the D as dominant as possible but you CANNOT just pit a mediocre Offense out there at the same time
We need the #1 D! And it is possible!!DT, LB, CB.
Keep Hankins and get a trash can full of dirt
A good LB in either the draft or FA
and a CB - the draft seems to have a fair number of good ones
You get all that and this D will be a TOP 5
I understand that, but what does your all in consist of thoughI agree. But I think the O has a very good chance of having an excellent O line. Steele coming back, and all the other O line pieces are their. Dak will only be asked to make a few plays and drive the bus. We have great depth and talent at TE. Let Schultz walk. Signing Gallop to a big contract was a mistake, but maybe, he will get better further from his injury. TY Hilton has the talent to be a 2nd. Drop Zek and keep Pollard or drop both of them. Many backs out there that will be able to run effectively behind this retooled O line. Davis may be part of the answer!
Of course we need a ball control efficient offense, which we should be able to do with our talent, and McCarthy, calling the plays. But we must go all in on making this a DOMINANT D. These defenses do not come around every year! We are only a couple of good moves from a DOMINANT D. Jerry go all in and make it happen.
No I don’t understand the game is changing and rules favor Offense.That doesn’t mean the defense can’t dominate. Condescension is not a good lookThe better D will win.
Philly is not a dominant D, but with their running game and defense, they will beat the best O in football.
Most fans are like you. You don’t understand how a truly dominant D helps the whole team. Dallas is only a few good moves from being dominant. The Whiners were close to being dominant, but not quite. There were no dominant D’s in the NFL last year.