Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
Bleu Star;1323449 said:You're making too much sense and I feel very strange about this given the belief that you aren't a Cowboys fan. Stop it! :
he's anti-Cowboys
think about it
Bleu Star;1323449 said:You're making too much sense and I feel very strange about this given the belief that you aren't a Cowboys fan. Stop it! :
Good lord. next year is in all likelihood Parcells last year. If we succeed great. If not we move on. We just don't know how things will turn out at this time. There are reasons for optimism as a previous poster laid out. end of story.Bleu Star;1323451 said:How many years will be enough to satisfy the eternal optimists?
check my quote on Clausewitz to see what I think of "sweeping" statements such as those.summerisfunner;1323478 said:that isn't bashing someone who isn't optimistic, we were asked why should we be optimistic for the coming season, and it was given, simple as that
so collapsing in December can't be anything else besides coaching? gotcha
bratchek;1323400 said:I've taken some college math........so let me try something. If we take 7 and divide it by 9 thats .563. And last I checked .563>.500. and the same last year. He's changed the team in 4 years and is making progress but you want instant success. That doesn't happen often in this league.
summerisfunner;1323480 said:he's anti-Cowboys
think about it
It also colors his POV as well. It's hardly surprising someone taking a half glass empty approach would find much that he agreed with.Bleu Star;1323508 said:He's also being surprisingly level headed too.
windward;1323481 said:Good lord. next year is in all likelihood Parcells last year. If we succeed great. If not we move on. We just don't know how things will turn out at this time. There are reasons for optimism as a previous poster laid out. end of story.
ummm ok. Don't get the referenceBleu Star;1323516 said:
firehawk350;1323372 said:1) Not an automatic fix. There will be growing pains the first half of the season...
yes because players never get better their second year of starting2) No guarantee that Romo bounces back. You would think that as he got more starts, he'd get better... But that didn't happen either
3) TO + TG = 68 years between them next year...
4) Marco Rivera will be replaced by who??? How about the rest of the only mediocre line?
5) Bobby Carpenter will be good, I give you that.
6) Roy Williams isn't going to get any better. He is a run stopper with no coverage abilities. What can possibly happen better, he hit harder? I don't see that happening either...
10) So you think one play was the difference between you and the Super Bowl? Or even a playoff victory?
Bleu Star;1323383 said:Amen to everything you said.
It really pains me when I find the words of someone that doesn't appear to be a Cowboys fan more succinct than those by a fellow fan. I guess it truly does sometimes take an indifferent or 3rd party opinion to level the playing field.
Bleu Star;1323503 said:Let me toss some elementary math at you.
34(# of wins in 4 years) divided into 66(# of games played in 4 years) = .515
.515 rounded to the nearest whole = .500
A bit more...
0 (# of playoff wins) divided into 4(# of years in place) = 0
You don't need college math to figure this one out.
I think labeling the Commanders fan as an "indifferent party" to be equally hilarious.BigDFan5;1323551 said:agreeing with a Commanders fan about how much the cowboys will suck priceless
don't you realize that .500 is a WHOLE number?bratchek;1323555 said:Well then if we are rounding when you get to 1/2 you of anything you generaly round up so if we go that rout .5 goes to 1.000
BigDFan5;1323551 said:agreeing with a Commanders fan about how much the cowboys will suck priceless
bratchek;1323555 said:Well then if we are rounding when you get to 1/2 you of anything you generaly round up so if we go that rout .5 goes to 1.000
windward;1323575 said:don't you realize that .500 is a WHOLE number?
ah, good ole determinism. Football just doesn't work that way.Bleu Star;1323579 said:I'm glad you find humor in it. You won't find any humor in 2007 if nothing major changes.
I know. I was poking fun at Bleu Star's math knowledge.bratchek;1323587 said:No. .500 is 50%. 50% this is simply 1 divided by 2 which is a fraction. Grade school math.
bratchek;1323587 said:No. .500 is 50%. 50% this is simply 1 divided by 2 which is a fraction. Grade school math.