Randle Vows Not To Be A Cancer

The RB carry data has been posted and reposted in just about every one of the RB threads in the offseason. It's readily available for anybody who wants to look for it.

The actuary tables for the position are pretty clear. It's a position where competitive players can be found comparatively late in the draft, where players tend to peak early and where the dropoff tends to be fast once it starts, where injuries are common and where you can get similar offensive productivity from short passing game or a committee if you want to.
 


Way to put the team first Randle.


Clearly all he cares about is the Dallas Cowboys and our chance at winning. Nothing selfish about this guy.


Jason Garrett could learn from a guy like this. Instead of being so stubborn with the scheme how about doing what is best for the team similar to what Joseph Randle is doing.
 
No, they don't have 11M in cap space.

They have 8.3M but Greg Hardy's contract is structured such that it only hit the cap each week as he get's paid his per game bonus. Assuming that Hardy's plays 12 games, the current cap space is about 1.4M.

You don't count his first 2 games played since they were already factored in as LTBE since he was active for 2 games last year. That adds back another 1.2m.

And there is some confusion to the 8.3m number. Without knowing all the IR guys and who got settlements, that number can be a lot closer to the 11m number.

If you have official numbers I would to see the link. I only use Spotrac, OTC and the NFLPA page for info.
 
You don't count his first 2 games played since they were already factored in as LTBE since he was active for 2 games last year. That adds back another 1.2m.

And there is some confusion to the 8.3m number. Without knowing all the IR guys and who got settlements, that number can be a lot closer to the 11m number.

If you have official numbers I would to see the link. I only use Spotrac, OTC and the NFLPA page for info.

Your numbers are way off how do you see the Cowboys guaranteeing Murray 19 million over 5 years while only taking a cap hit of 4 mill the 1st year?

How do you factor all of that in while paying Dez guarantees and resigning Hardy?

And what about Crawfords escalating pay?

You have been consistently wrong about the cap hit of resigning Murray yet you try to continue using these same figures hoping people will just ignore the actual overall cap ramifications.

The fact you think we have 11 million in cap room that could have been used for Murray shows how off you are, after Hardy gets his money there will not even be the mythical 4 million for Murray you proposed before.
 
Your numbers are way off how do you see the Cowboys guaranteeing Murray 19 million over 5 years while only taking a cap hit of 4 mill the 1st year?

How do you factor all of that in while paying Dez guarantees and resigning Hardy?

And what about Crawfords escalating pay?

You have been consistently wrong about the cap hit of resigning Murray yet you try to continue using these same figures hoping people will just ignore the actual overall cap ramifications.

The fact you think we have 11 million in cap room that could have been used for Murray shows how off you are, after Hardy gets his money there will not even be the mythical 4 million for Murray you proposed before.

Try reading what I wrote next time and you could answer all your stupid questions yourself.
 
Your numbers are way off how do you see the Cowboys guaranteeing Murray 19 million over 5 years while only taking a cap hit of 4 mill the 1st year?

How do you factor all of that in while paying Dez guarantees and resigning Hardy?

And what about Crawfords escalating pay?

You have been consistently wrong about the cap hit of resigning Murray yet you try to continue using these same figures hoping people will just ignore the actual overall cap ramifications.

The fact you think we have 11 million in cap room that could have been used for Murray shows how off you are, after Hardy gets his money there will not even be the mythical 4 million for Murray you proposed before.

DAL is 35m under the cap next year if they redo TSmith, TCrawford and Carr with cuts to Free and Mcfadden.

They also have another 20m in easily attainable restructures if wanted.

They have to sign GHardy-10, RMcClain-4, CWhite-3, Dunbar-2 and maybe Mincey-2 and Bern-2. Add 6m for a cap hit for Murray with ease.
 
DAL is 35m under the cap next year if they redo TSmith, TCrawford and Carr with cuts to Free and Mcfadden.

They also have another 20m in easily attainable restructures if wanted.

They have to sign GHardy-10, RMcClain-4, CWhite-3, Dunbar-2 and maybe Mincey-2 and Bern-2. Add 6m for a cap hit for Murray with ease.

If was a fifth.

Like I said it was not easy to fit that cap number under the current circumstances and in your scenario they are restructuring the entire team.

What happens when Frederick and Martin are up?

You do know that restructures have to paid off eventually, I see your idea of cap management is to keep kicking the can down the road.

And I really want to see how you come up with this 55 million in cap space.
 
If was a fifth.

Like I said it was not easy to fit that cap number under the current circumstances and in your scenario they are restructuring the entire team.

What happens when Frederick and Martin are up?

You do know that restructures have to paid off eventually, I see your idea of cap management is to keep kicking the can down the road.

And I really want to see how you come up with this 55 million in cap space.

You do know they restructured almost everyone this year except Carr. It is how they do it and how they should do it.

And 3 restructures next year is not "the entire team".

With 850k in Dead Money next year they can afford to kick some down the road. The cap keeps going up.

You don't get any Accounting Prizes for being well under the cap. You should try to spend as much of the cap every year when trying to win it all.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,026
Messages
14,577,119
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top