Rapoport: Keep an eye on Cowboys if Rams deal Foles

plymkr

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,385
Reaction score
15,496
how much would it cost us to get him? speculation of coarse? what do you guys think?
 

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication
Messages
7,278
Reaction score
3,582
I want no part of Foles, I would rather take my chance with a rookie QB. Foles was benched for Case Keenum (sp).
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,729
Reaction score
36,763
I can't see Miami or Dallas interested in him.

Not sure why the Skins would be either, unless the Cousins contract issue blows up
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Who cares? He stinks. And he has a fairly sizeable contract.

I am stunned there are people who would want him. I can't be any clearer than this................. HE BLOWS

You've said you don't like him, you don't need to continuously regurgitate the same statement hah.
 

plymkr

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,385
Reaction score
15,496
Who cares? He stinks. And he has a fairly sizeable contract.

I am stunned there are people who would want him. I can't be any clearer than this................. HE BLOWS

I'm not saying I want him, but I'm going to not want him even more if we give up a 3rd or a 4th for him, considering we've traded several picks for Cassell already.
 

ferrispata

Active Member
Messages
509
Reaction score
156
Not really. I'd rather play Wentz or Goff in relief of Romo than Foles.

I don't people realize just how terrible Foles is. People were wowed by his first year under Kelly but the bottom dropped out big time on him. He's got a popcorn arm, he has no mobility, he got into bad habits of throwing off his back foot, he has little pocket awareness.

In other words............. he blows. I'd rather bring Weeden back.

You don't want to throw either Wentz or Goff or any 1st year Qb into the mix without at least a year or two in the system. 2-3 would be ideal. I would take Foles in a heartbeat as a backup to Romo. But not for more than a 5th-6th.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,723
Reaction score
95,232
You don't want to throw either Wentz or Goff or any 1st year Qb into the mix without at least a year or two in the system. 2-3 would be ideal. I would take Foles in a heartbeat as a backup to Romo. But not for more than a 5th-6th.

Foles is really no better than Weeden or Cassel. And he carries a fairly big cap hit for a backup if you bring him in. His base salary for 2017 alone is over $10,000,000. Remember, the Rams gave him a new deal after acquiring him.

There's a reason why the Rams are shopping him. He stinks (he got benched) and he carries a big cap number. The Rams did what some people here are doing - looking at the 2013 season and saying to themselves, gee, that guy can play.

No he can't.

There are better, cheaper options out there than Nick Foles as your backup.
 

PJTHEDOORS

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,190
Reaction score
18,582
You don't want to throw either Wentz or Goff or any 1st year Qb into the mix without at least a year or two in the system. 2-3 would be ideal. I would take Foles in a heartbeat as a backup to Romo. But not for more than a 5th-6th.

Behind our OL, I'm fine with either Wentz or Goff for a short stint (assuming Romo with another injury, has to sit a few games).
 
Top