Taxing day
but I am gonna get this in while I can.
[
Disclaimer: These are my opinions and my opinions alone.]
I uploaded a pic of the main three sites I visit for both paid critics and general audience movie reviews before leaving for work:
I am sure the numbers have changed during the day. Personally, I take others' reviews in several ways. Sometimes I agree with paid critics and disagree with general audience opinion. Other times I disagree with paid critics and hang with general audience opinion. There are times I agree with both and times I agree with neither. This is one time my opinion kinda slides moreso towards paid critics, which surprises me.
You can see from the above pic that paid critics associated with both Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic enjoyed the movie more generally. I tend to include IMDB also because I often agree with its overall rating for everyone, paid or not.
Let me also throw in my own scale I use for all movies, no exception:
9-10 Excellent
7-9 Good to Very Good
5-7 Fair
3-5 Poor
1-3 Bad
<1 Someone should die for making garbage as garbage
I have several wants before sitting down for a movie:
1. I want to be entertained. I want to laugh if it is a comedy, follow seriously if it is a drama, be on the edge of my seat if it is suspense/thriller, etc. That is my own definition of entertainment for me.
2. I want to not get lost in the flow of the movie.
3. I want adequate or better direction.
4. I want good or better acting.
5. I want cinematography, visual/sound effects, etc. matching the story and not substandard.
6. For adaptations, I want the movie to capture what I think the author(s) have already created in print.
7. I want documentaries with zero commercialization content.
To me,
Captain Marvel checked boxes 1 though 6. What lowered my grade was:
- a science-fiction/fantasy movie that did not completely immense itself into either category
- lack of scene energy in the first half of the movie, which I blame directing more than acting
- not really knockout special effects throughout the movie
So! When I read an review such as Rotten Tomatoes Ewan M from March 11th, who wrote:
"Really not impressed with the latest installment of the MCU. From a dull, uninspriring main character, miss casting, plot holes larger than the super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy. Not one iota of thought has gone into this script, even someone with basic knowledge would realize they'd have an issue with this script.
This movie has made me fear the upcoming endgame film. Please don't destroy everything because of this one film..."
... his opinion does not register for me.
I could agree with CM being emotionless at times. Uninspiring? That reads like he did not follow the character experiences during the movie.
Really like to know what his casting choices would have been. Jackson, Gregg, Hounsou and Pace (Ronan) are established casting pieces in the MCU. Law and Bening were solid choices. Is he talking about Larson? Who did he want for the role. Of course, Larson sold me by the second half of the movie so I do not care.
There are always plot hole issues for some people. Not saying there were not any. Just saying there were none significant enough to smear the movie itself.
Then there is this 'fear' he has how
CM will undermine
Avengers IV. Nothing, in my opinion, was introduced in this movie that will unbalance
Avengers Endgame. It is my judgment and it could be a totally incorrect assumption but I do not think he knows jack <expletive> about the character and what she means to the Marvel Universe.
So what am I trying to say in my longwindedness? My opinion?
Captain Marvel is a good movie and a number of people got turned off by the movie for reasons that are not the movie's fault. Could be wrong. Could be completely wrong. meh. I'm me.