Zman5
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,299
- Reaction score
- 20,946
Look at the use of language here.
The offense scored "some points" in the first half. No! The offense scored 24(!) points in the first half and were never stopped. That's an amazing half of football. Heck, that's a very good GAME of football. Especially when you factor in that they lost an entire drive because of the muffed punt.
You can't expect the defense to make a stop "every time." No! How about making one single solitary stop? How about when we pin them back at their 10 and their 12, as we did on consecutive punts? Can I expect that? The defense failed to make a single stop in the last five(!) Rams drives of the second half. That's horrific, completely independent of the offense.
The offense can absolutely be absolved from the loss. The loss is on the defense and special teams. Clearly.
Defense made a stop when the Rams had the ball first in the second half. Then the offense punted 3 times and threw an INT and gave the ball back on Dallas 29. That INT had almost as much impact on the outcome of the game as the bad ST play you keep harping on. Yet you think the ST had a big impact on the loss and offense had none. That makes absolutely no sense.